- From: David Schinazi <dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2023 14:02:45 -0800
- To: Christopher Wood <caw@heapingbits.net>
- Cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Tommy Pauly <tpauly@apple.com>
- Message-ID: <CAPDSy+5LSu0RjzsysTVx62-TzGdAGr0Zrn3Y5f8tF_VKBLiKQw@mail.gmail.com>
Thank everyone for the review! I totally agree that the u= parameter was not intended as a super-cookie but instead as a key identifier (i.e. what key should the server use to check the HMAC or signature?). Chris's proposal to rename it from u= to k= sounds good to me, and also adding text to warn against tracking vectors sounds warranted. I've filed [1] to track this. I'll jump into potential solutions to these GitHub issues once the adoption call is complete. Thanks, David [1] https://github.com/DavidSchinazi/draft-schinazi-httpbis-transport-auth/issues/23 On Tue, Feb 7, 2023 at 12:44 PM Christopher Wood <caw@heapingbits.net> wrote: > I'm supportive of adopting this draft on the basis of the desired use > cases. They may be rather niche -- and should likely be added to the draft > [0] -- but I understand them to have value. > > I do have some questions about the technical contents, which I've filed > issues to track [1,2,3,4,5]. I'm happy to help seek resolution of those on > GitHub. > > Are there any implementations of this mechanism yet? I would be happy to > help provide an implementation of the server piece for interop tests. > > Best, > Chris > > [0] > https://github.com/DavidSchinazi/draft-schinazi-httpbis-transport-auth/issues/22 > [1] > https://github.com/DavidSchinazi/draft-schinazi-httpbis-transport-auth/issues/17 > [2] > https://github.com/DavidSchinazi/draft-schinazi-httpbis-transport-auth/issues/18 > [3] > https://github.com/DavidSchinazi/draft-schinazi-httpbis-transport-auth/issues/19 > [4] > https://github.com/DavidSchinazi/draft-schinazi-httpbis-transport-auth/issues/20 > [5] > https://github.com/DavidSchinazi/draft-schinazi-httpbis-transport-auth/issues/21 > > > On Feb 7, 2023, at 12:58 AM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote: > > > > Hello everyone, > > > > We first discussed this draft at IETF114[1], saw implementation > interest at IETF115, [2] and finally had some more list discussion. > > > > This is a Call for Adoption for: > > > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-schinazi-httpbis-unprompted-auth-01.html > > > > Please indicate (in response to this message) whether you support > adoption, and whether you intend to implement. > > > > The CfA will last for two weeks. > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > 1. > https://httpwg.org/wg-materials/ietf114/minutes.html#transport-auth-david-schinazi > > 1. https://httpwg.org/wg-materials/ietf115/minutes.html#unprompted-auth > > > > -- > > Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/ > > > > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 7 February 2023 22:03:10 UTC