Hiya, On 07/02/2023 05:58, Mark Nottingham wrote: > Hello everyone, > > We first discussed this draft at IETF114[1], saw implementation > interest at IETF115, [2] and finally had some more list discussion. > > This is a Call for Adoption for: > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-schinazi-httpbis-unprompted-auth-01.html > > Please indicate (in response to this message) whether you support > adoption, and whether you intend to implement. I'm not sure. Can someone clarify whether the u= field amounts to a super-cookie or not, and if not, how that might be the case? If there's a good answer to the above, I'd support adoption. If not, not. Thanks, S. PS: This has something in common with RFC7486 which was a (failed;-() attempt at a similar thing. I don't think this draft needs to refer to that, but if the authors weren't aware of it, they might be interested. > > The CfA will last for two weeks. > > Cheers, > > > 1. > https://httpwg.org/wg-materials/ietf114/minutes.html#transport-auth-david-schinazi > > 1. https://httpwg.org/wg-materials/ietf115/minutes.html#unprompted-auth > > -- Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/ > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 7 February 2023 12:32:46 UTC