- From: Soni L. <fakedme+http@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2023 18:41:42 -0300
- To: Nick Harper <ietf@nharper.org>
- Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <eb8e0e06-6515-c1d5-bee7-edc3ed92ff22@gmail.com>
On 1/30/23 18:27, Nick Harper wrote: > It sounds like what you want is Client Hints > (https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Client_hints). Roughly, but it still doesn't eliminate the existing headers altogether. Client Hints seems to be *positive* hints only, i.e. "send these, please". What about *negative* hints, i.e. "don't even bother sending these"? How do you prevent useless data from being sent? > > On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 10:48 AM Soni L. <fakedme+http@gmail.com > <mailto:fakedme%2Bhttp@gmail.com>> wrote: > > > > On 1/30/23 04:44, Fabian Keil wrote: > > "Soni L." <fakedme+http@gmail.com > <mailto:fakedme%2Bhttp@gmail.com>> wrote on 2023-01-29 at 11:45:53: > > > > > It would be appreciated if there were a slower HTTP, with more > round > > > trips, explicitly designed with privacy negotiation in mind. > > > > > > Importantly, you can't leak data which you do not have. The > best way to > > > not have that data is to not receive it. > > > > > > Why does a server need to accept user agents and a bunch of other > > > unnecessary stuff if it isn't gonna use it? Doesn't it just > make the > > > server more liable for no good reason? Make it possible to > turn it off! > > > Most of it can just be turned off. > > > > > > In fact, the simplest servers (static hosting) only really > need the URL > > > and the Host. Everything else is unnecessary liability. > > > > It's not exactly what you ask for, but Privoxy [0] has a > > delay-response{} response action [1] that is somewhat related. > > > > Fabian > > > > [0] <https://www.privoxy.org/> > > [1] > <https://www.privoxy.org/user-manual/actions-file.html#DELAY-RESPONSE> > It's not at all what we ask for! Uh, we mean like, why does the HTTP > server have to parse and discard the User-Agent header and another > 10 or > so headers which it has no use for, instead of just... not receiving > those headers in the first place? > > Why can't the client send URL and Host, then wait for the server > to send > a Headers Required message, then send the required headers (which > may be > none)? Yes, it takes longer (more RTTs), but the best way to improve > privacy is to not have the data in the first place. >
Received on Monday, 30 January 2023 21:41:58 UTC