- From: Soni L. <fakedme+http@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2023 18:41:42 -0300
- To: Nick Harper <ietf@nharper.org>
- Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <eb8e0e06-6515-c1d5-bee7-edc3ed92ff22@gmail.com>
On 1/30/23 18:27, Nick Harper wrote:
> It sounds like what you want is Client Hints
> (https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Client_hints).
Roughly, but it still doesn't eliminate the existing headers altogether.
Client Hints seems to be *positive* hints only, i.e. "send these, please".
What about *negative* hints, i.e. "don't even bother sending these"? How
do you prevent useless data from being sent?
>
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 10:48 AM Soni L. <fakedme+http@gmail.com
> <mailto:fakedme%2Bhttp@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 1/30/23 04:44, Fabian Keil wrote:
> > "Soni L." <fakedme+http@gmail.com
> <mailto:fakedme%2Bhttp@gmail.com>> wrote on 2023-01-29 at 11:45:53:
> >
> > > It would be appreciated if there were a slower HTTP, with more
> round
> > > trips, explicitly designed with privacy negotiation in mind.
> > >
> > > Importantly, you can't leak data which you do not have. The
> best way to
> > > not have that data is to not receive it.
> > >
> > > Why does a server need to accept user agents and a bunch of other
> > > unnecessary stuff if it isn't gonna use it? Doesn't it just
> make the
> > > server more liable for no good reason? Make it possible to
> turn it off!
> > > Most of it can just be turned off.
> > >
> > > In fact, the simplest servers (static hosting) only really
> need the URL
> > > and the Host. Everything else is unnecessary liability.
> >
> > It's not exactly what you ask for, but Privoxy [0] has a
> > delay-response{} response action [1] that is somewhat related.
> >
> > Fabian
> >
> > [0] <https://www.privoxy.org/>
> > [1]
> <https://www.privoxy.org/user-manual/actions-file.html#DELAY-RESPONSE>
> It's not at all what we ask for! Uh, we mean like, why does the HTTP
> server have to parse and discard the User-Agent header and another
> 10 or
> so headers which it has no use for, instead of just... not receiving
> those headers in the first place?
>
> Why can't the client send URL and Host, then wait for the server
> to send
> a Headers Required message, then send the required headers (which
> may be
> none)? Yes, it takes longer (more RTTs), but the best way to improve
> privacy is to not have the data in the first place.
>
Received on Monday, 30 January 2023 21:41:58 UTC