- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2023 11:01:04 +1100
- To: "Julian F. Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: Lucas Pardue <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
> On 24 Jan 2023, at 3:09 am, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: > > What about a dictionary, where you're only looking for "x" (expected to > be an integer), but the sender adds an extension parameter "y" as sf-date? > > A conforming parser (of the current spec) will reject the whole field > value, and the recipient will not be able to see the value for "x". If you are parsing a field that uses Date, its specification will refer to sf-bis, not RFC8941. Therefore, you will need to use an implementation that claims conformance to sf-bis. What's the problem? -- Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/
Received on Tuesday, 24 January 2023 00:01:42 UTC