ietf-http-wg@w3.org from April to June 2023 by date

Friday, 30 June 2023

• Re: Compression dictionary draft ID - draft-meenan-httpbis-compression-dictionary-00 Patrick Meenan
• Re: Compression dictionary draft ID - draft-meenan-httpbis-compression-dictionary-00 Lucas Pardue
• Re: Compression dictionary draft ID - draft-meenan-httpbis-compression-dictionary-00 Patrick Meenan
• Re: Compression dictionary draft ID - draft-meenan-httpbis-compression-dictionary-00 Ilari Liusvaara
• Compression dictionary draft ID - draft-meenan-httpbis-compression-dictionary-00 Patrick Meenan
• Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis Poul-Henning Kamp
• Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC9218 (7556) Lucas Pardue
• Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC9218 (7556) Mark Nottingham
• DRAFT agenda for IETF 117 Mark Nottingham

Thursday, 29 June 2023

• Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC9218 (7556) Lucas Pardue
• [Technical Errata Reported] RFC9218 (7556) RFC Errata System
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-unprompted-auth-03 Ilari Liusvaara
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-unprompted-auth-03 David Schinazi
• Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis Ilari Liusvaara
• Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis Poul-Henning Kamp
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-unprompted-auth-03 Ilari Liusvaara
• Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis Ilari Liusvaara
• A "return to sender" 3xx status code Soni L.

Wednesday, 28 June 2023

• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-unprompted-auth-04.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-unprompted-auth-03 Lucas Pardue
• draft-ietf-httpbis-unprompted-auth-03 David Schinazi
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-unprompted-auth-03.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org

Monday, 26 June 2023

• Re: Two new HTTP caching specifications Tommy Pauly
• Re: Two new HTTP caching specifications Mark Nottingham
• Re: Two new HTTP caching specifications Martin Thomson
• Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis Poul-Henning Kamp
• Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis Mark Nottingham
• Re: Two new HTTP caching specifications Mark Nottingham
• Re: Two new HTTP caching specifications Martin Thomson

Sunday, 25 June 2023

• Re: Two new HTTP caching specifications Mark Nottingham
• Re: Two new HTTP caching specifications Watson Ladd
• Two new HTTP caching specifications Mark Nottingham

Saturday, 24 June 2023

• Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-httpbis-alias-proxy-status-05 Mark Nottingham via Datatracker

Friday, 23 June 2023

• Re: Roman Danyliw's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-17: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) Justin Richer
• Re: RFC 9110: HTTP Semantics - Terminology: "applying a request" (was Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC9110 (7530)) Julian Reschke

Thursday, 22 June 2023

• Re: Roman Danyliw's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-17: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) Justin Richer

Tuesday, 20 June 2023

• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-alias-proxy-status-05.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org

Monday, 19 June 2023

• Re: 103 Early Hints Dragana Damjanovic
• Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation Eric J Bowman
• Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation Eric J Bowman
• Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation Eric J Bowman

Saturday, 17 June 2023

• RFC 9205 vs. CL0P Eric J Bowman

Wednesday, 14 June 2023

• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-message signature demo Henry Story
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-message signature demo Justin Richer
• Re: Working Group Last Call: draft-pauly-httpbis-alias-proxy-status-03 Tommy Pauly
• Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis Tommy Pauly
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-alias-proxy-status-04.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org
• draft-ietf-httpbis-message signature demo Henry Story

Tuesday, 13 June 2023

• Re: Working Group Last Call: draft-pauly-httpbis-alias-proxy-status-03 Mark Nottingham

Monday, 12 June 2023

• RFC 9412 on The ORIGIN Extension in HTTP/3 rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
• Re: Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-17: (with COMMENT) Martin Duke
• Re: Request-Off-The-Record Mode header Caleb Queern
• Re: Request-Off-The-Record Mode header Mike West
• Re: Request-Off-The-Record Mode header Caleb Queern
• Re: Request-Off-The-Record Mode header Dennis Jackson
• Re: Request-Off-The-Record Mode header Mike West
• Re: Request-Off-The-Record Mode header Shivan Kaul Sahib
• Re: Request-Off-The-Record Mode header Shivan Kaul Sahib
• Re: Request-Off-The-Record Mode header Greg Wilkins
• Re: Request-Off-The-Record Mode header Shivan Kaul Sahib
• Re: Request-Off-The-Record Mode header Shivan Kaul Sahib
• Re: Request-Off-The-Record Mode header Ángel

Sunday, 11 June 2023

• Re: 103 Early Hints Stefan Eissing

Saturday, 10 June 2023

• Re: 103 Early Hints Patrick Meenan
• 103 Early Hints Lucas Pardue
• Re: RFC 9110: HTTP Semantics - Terminology: "applying a request" (was Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC9110 (7530)) Julian Reschke

Friday, 9 June 2023

• Re: Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-17: (with COMMENT) Justin Richer
• Re: John Scudder's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-17: (with COMMENT) Justin Richer
• Re: Roman Danyliw's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-17: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) Justin Richer
• Re: Request-Off-The-Record Mode header Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Request-Off-The-Record Mode header Watson Ladd

Thursday, 8 June 2023

• Re: Request-Off-The-Record Mode header Martin Thomson
• HTTP Resumable Uploads on Apple Platforms Jonathan Flat
• Re: Request-Off-The-Record Mode header David Schinazi
• RE: Request-Off-The-Record Mode header Eric Lawrence
• Request-Off-The-Record Mode header Shivan Kaul Sahib
• Roman Danyliw's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-17: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) Roman Danyliw via Datatracker

Wednesday, 7 June 2023

• John Scudder's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-17: (with COMMENT) John Scudder via Datatracker
• Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-17: (with COMMENT) Martin Duke via Datatracker

Tuesday, 6 June 2023

• Artart telechat review of draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-17 Harald Alvestrand via Datatracker

Sunday, 4 June 2023

• Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) Repository Activity Summary Bot

Thursday, 1 June 2023

• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers-11 Lucas Pardue
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers-11 Rob Sayre

Wednesday, 31 May 2023

• Re: Lars Eggert's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers-12: (with COMMENT) Lucas Pardue
• Re: RFC 9110: HTTP Semantics - Terminology: "applying a request" (was Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC9110 (7530)) Julian Reschke
• Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC9110 (7530) Mark Thomas

Tuesday, 30 May 2023

• Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC9110 (7530) Julian Reschke
• Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC9110 (7530) Roy T. Fielding
• Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC9110 (7530) Roberto Polli
• Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC9110 (7530) Julian Reschke
• Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis Kazuho Oku
• Re: Libraries assuming iso-8859-1 (was: Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis) Mark Nottingham

Monday, 29 May 2023

• [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC9110 (7530) RFC Errata System
• Re: Libraries assuming iso-8859-1 (was: Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis) Martin Thomson
• Re: Libraries assuming iso-8859-1 (was: Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis) Mark Nottingham

Sunday, 28 May 2023

• Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis Julian Reschke
• Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis Julian Reschke
• Re: Libraries assuming iso-8859-1 (was: Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis) Julian Reschke
• Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis Willy Tarreau
• Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis Martin J. Dürst
• Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) Repository Activity Summary Bot
• Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis Martin J. Dürst
• Re: Libraries assuming iso-8859-1 (was: Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis) Poul-Henning Kamp
• Libraries assuming iso-8859-1 (was: Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis) Martin J. Dürst
• Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis Willy Tarreau
• Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis Mark Nottingham
• Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis Julian Reschke

Saturday, 27 May 2023

• Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis Willy Tarreau
• Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis Michael Sweet
• Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis Julian Reschke
• Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis Martin J. Dürst
• Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis Willy Tarreau
• Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis David Benjamin
• Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis Mark Nottingham

Friday, 26 May 2023

• Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis Roy T. Fielding
• Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis Ilari Liusvaara
• UTF-8 I can live with Poul-Henning Kamp
• Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis Poul-Henning Kamp
• Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis Mark Nottingham
• Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis Poul-Henning Kamp
• Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis Glenn Strauss
• Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis Mark Nottingham
• Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis Poul-Henning Kamp
• Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis Julian Reschke
• Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis Julian Reschke

Thursday, 25 May 2023

• Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis Mark Nottingham
• Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis Poul-Henning Kamp
• Fwd: [Webtransport] I-D Action: draft-ietf-webtrans-http3-06.txt Mark Nottingham
• Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis Roy T. Fielding
• Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis Mark Thomas
• Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis Martin Thomson
• Lars Eggert's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers-12: (with COMMENT) Lars Eggert via Datatracker
• Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis Poul-Henning Kamp
• Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis Mark Nottingham
• Re: Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis Julian Reschke
• Consensus call to include Display Strings in draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis Tommy Pauly

Wednesday, 24 May 2023

• httpbis - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 117 IETF Meeting Session Request Tool
• Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers-12 Peter Yee via Datatracker
• Re: Paul Wouters' Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers-12: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) Lucas Pardue
• Paul Wouters' Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers-12: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) Paul Wouters via Datatracker
• Re: Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers-12: (with COMMENT) Lucas Pardue
• Adding more concrete guidance about digest processing and validation Lucas Pardue
• Re: John Scudder's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers-12: (with COMMENT) Lucas Pardue
• Re: John Scudder's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers-12: (with COMMENT) Lucas Pardue
• Re: Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers-12: (with COMMENT) Roberto Polli
• Re: John Scudder's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers-12: (with COMMENT) Roberto Polli
• Re: Working Group Last Call: draft-pauly-httpbis-alias-proxy-status-03 Lucas Pardue
• Working Group Last Call: draft-pauly-httpbis-alias-proxy-status-03 Mark Nottingham

Tuesday, 23 May 2023

• Re: Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers-12: (with COMMENT) Lucas Pardue
• Re: Does anyone actually use HTTP_1_1_REQUIRED or HTTP_VERSION_FALLBACK? Ilari Liusvaara
• Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers-12: (with COMMENT) Roman Danyliw via Datatracker
• Re: John Scudder's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers-12: (with COMMENT) Lucas Pardue
• Re: Does anyone actually use HTTP_1_1_REQUIRED or HTTP_VERSION_FALLBACK? Valentin Gosu
• John Scudder's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers-12: (with COMMENT) John Scudder via Datatracker
• Re: Does anyone actually use HTTP_1_1_REQUIRED or HTTP_VERSION_FALLBACK? Lucas Pardue
• Re: Does anyone actually use HTTP_1_1_REQUIRED or HTTP_VERSION_FALLBACK? Valentin Gosu
• Re: Does anyone actually use HTTP_1_1_REQUIRED or HTTP_VERSION_FALLBACK? Willy Tarreau
• Re: Does anyone actually use HTTP_1_1_REQUIRED or HTTP_VERSION_FALLBACK? Stefan Eissing
• Re: Does anyone actually use HTTP_1_1_REQUIRED or HTTP_VERSION_FALLBACK? David Benjamin
• Re: Does anyone actually use HTTP_1_1_REQUIRED or HTTP_VERSION_FALLBACK? Bence Béky
• Re: Does anyone actually use HTTP_1_1_REQUIRED or HTTP_VERSION_FALLBACK? Daniel Stenberg
• Does anyone actually use HTTP_1_1_REQUIRED or HTTP_VERSION_FALLBACK? Lucas Pardue
• Re: Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers-12: (with COMMENT) Lucas Pardue
• Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers-12: (with COMMENT) Robert Wilton via Datatracker

Monday, 22 May 2023

• Re: Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers-12: (with COMMENT) Martin Duke
• Re: Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers-12: (with COMMENT) Lucas Pardue
• Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers-12: (with COMMENT) Martin Duke via Datatracker
• Re: WebSockets and masking Dragana Damjanovic

Sunday, 21 May 2023

• Is it okay to (mis)use Referer header for "share with app" functionality? Soni L.
• Re: WebSockets and masking Martin Thomson
• Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) Repository Activity Summary Bot

Saturday, 20 May 2023

• Re: WebSockets and masking Willy Tarreau
• Re: WebSockets and masking Ilari Liusvaara
• Re: WebSockets and masking Willy Tarreau
• Re: WebSockets and masking Ilari Liusvaara
• Re: WebSockets and masking Willy Tarreau

Friday, 19 May 2023

• Re: WebSockets and masking David Schinazi
• WebSockets and masking Dragana Damjanovic

Wednesday, 17 May 2023

• Re: sfbis - next steps; was: Working Group Last Call: Structured Fields Revision (RFC8941bis) Poul-Henning Kamp
• sfbis - next steps; was: Working Group Last Call: Structured Fields Revision (RFC8941bis) Julian Reschke
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-connect-tcp-00.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org
• Re: Call for Adoption: Template-Driven HTTP CONNECT Proxying for TCP Tommy Pauly

Tuesday, 16 May 2023

• Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-17 Daniel Migault via Datatracker

Sunday, 14 May 2023

• Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) Repository Activity Summary Bot

Thursday, 11 May 2023

• Re: Call for Adoption: Template-Driven HTTP CONNECT Proxying for TCP Eric Orth
• Re: Call for Adoption: Template-Driven HTTP CONNECT Proxying for TCP Christopher Wood
• Re: Call for Adoption: Template-Driven HTTP CONNECT Proxying for TCP Willy Tarreau
• Re: Call for Adoption: Template-Driven HTTP CONNECT Proxying for TCP Eric Kinnear
• Re: Call for Adoption: Template-Driven HTTP CONNECT Proxying for TCP Lucas Pardue
• Re: Call for Adoption: Template-Driven HTTP CONNECT Proxying for TCP Martin Thomson

Wednesday, 10 May 2023

• Re: Call for Adoption: Template-Driven HTTP CONNECT Proxying for TCP Tommy Pauly
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-12.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org
• Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-alias-proxy-status-03.txt Tommy Pauly
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-alias-proxy-status-03.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org
• Re: [EXTERNAL] Httpdir early review of draft-ietf-scim-cursor-pagination-00 Julian Reschke

Tuesday, 9 May 2023

• Re: Working Group Last Call: Structured Fields Revision (RFC8941bis) Julian Reschke

Sunday, 7 May 2023

• Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) Repository Activity Summary Bot

Tuesday, 2 May 2023

• Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-17.txt Justin Richer
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-17.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org

Monday, 1 May 2023

• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-alias-proxy-status-02.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org

Sunday, 30 April 2023

• Re: Working Group Last Call: Structured Fields Revision (RFC8941bis) Martin Thomson
• Re: Working Group Last Call: Structured Fields Revision (RFC8941bis) Julian Reschke
• Re: Working Group Last Call: Structured Fields Revision (RFC8941bis) Julian Reschke
• Re: Working Group Last Call: Structured Fields Revision (RFC8941bis) Poul-Henning Kamp
• Re: Working Group Last Call: Structured Fields Revision (RFC8941bis) Mark Nottingham
• Re: Working Group Last Call: Structured Fields Revision (RFC8941bis) Tommy Pauly
• Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) Repository Activity Summary Bot
• Re: Working Group Last Call: Structured Fields Revision (RFC8941bis) Julian Reschke

Saturday, 29 April 2023

• Re: Working Group Last Call: Structured Fields Revision (RFC8941bis) Tommy Pauly

Friday, 28 April 2023

• Httpdir early review of draft-ietf-satp-core-00 Lucas Pardue via Datatracker
• [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7486 (7498) RFC Errata System

Wednesday, 26 April 2023

• Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers-12.txt Lucas Pardue
• Re: Httpdir early review of draft-ietf-alto-new-transport-07 Martin Thomson

Tuesday, 25 April 2023

• Httpdir early review of draft-ietf-scitt-architecture-01 Darrel Miller via Datatracker

Sunday, 23 April 2023

• Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) Repository Activity Summary Bot

Saturday, 22 April 2023

• Re: I-D Action: draft-martin-http-carbon-emissions-scope-2-00.txt Rob Sayre
• Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers-12.txt Rob Sayre

Friday, 21 April 2023

• Re: Discovering WebSockets design team Valentin Gosu
• Structured Fields: forward compatibility for future field types Valentin Gosu

Thursday, 20 April 2023

• Re: Discovering WebSockets design team Kenichi Ishibashi

Monday, 17 April 2023

• Re: Call for Adoption: Template-Driven HTTP CONNECT Proxying for TCP David Schinazi
• Call for Adoption: Template-Driven HTTP CONNECT Proxying for TCP Tommy Pauly
• Working Group Last Call: Structured Fields Revision (RFC8941bis) Tommy Pauly
• Re: Structure Fields bis: JSON mapping (#2504) Mark Nottingham

Sunday, 16 April 2023

• Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) Repository Activity Summary Bot

Saturday, 15 April 2023

• Re: Discovering WebSockets design team Felipe Gasper
• Re: Discovering WebSockets design team Momoka Yamamoto

Friday, 14 April 2023

• Re: Structure Fields bis: JSON mapping (#2504) David Benjamin
• Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation Michael Douglass

Thursday, 6 April 2023

• Content Negotiation for Multipart Response Rahul Gupta

Monday, 10 April 2023

• Re: Httpdir early review of draft-ietf-alto-new-transport-07 Lachlan Keller

Wednesday, 15 March 2023

• [IANA #1268625] expert review for draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers (http-fields) David Dong via RT

Wednesday, 12 April 2023

• Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation Chris Elving
• Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation Iain McClenaghan

Thursday, 13 April 2023

• Content Negotiation for Multipart Response Rahul Gupta

Friday, 14 April 2023

• Re: Structure Fields bis: JSON mapping (#2504) Julian Reschke
• Re: Structure Fields bis: JSON mapping (#2504) Ilari Liusvaara
• Re: Structure Fields bis: JSON mapping (#2504) Poul-Henning Kamp
• Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation Greg Wilkins
• Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation Poul-Henning Kamp
• Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation Stefan Eissing
• Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation Willy Tarreau
• Re: Structure Fields bis: JSON mapping (#2504) Martin Thomson
• Structure Fields bis: JSON mapping (#2504) Mark Nottingham
• Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation gs-lists-ietf-http-wg@gluelogic.com

Thursday, 13 April 2023

• RE: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation Bertrand Martin
• RE: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation Bertrand Martin
• RE: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation Bertrand Martin
• RE: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation Bertrand Martin
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers-12.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org
• Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation Soni L.
• RE: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation Bertrand Martin
• RE: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation Bertrand Martin
• Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation Soni L.
• Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation Greg Wilkins
• RE: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation Bertrand Martin
• Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation Soni L.
• RE: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation Bertrand Martin
• RE: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation Bertrand Martin
• Re: Encodings for Signatures Julian Reschke
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers-11, "6.3. Usage in Signatures" Lucas Pardue

Wednesday, 12 April 2023

• Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation Mark Nottingham
• Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC9110 (7421) Mark Nottingham
• Encodings for Signatures Justin Richer
• Discovering WebSockets design team Lucas Pardue
• [Technical Errata Reported] RFC9110 (7421) RFC Errata System
• RE: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation Bertrand Martin
• Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation Lucas Pardue
• Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation Poul-Henning Kamp
• Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation Lucas Pardue
• Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation Greg Wilkins
• Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation Poul-Henning Kamp
• Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation Greg Wilkins
• Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation Eliot Lear
• Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation James Fuller
• Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation Mark Nottingham

Tuesday, 11 April 2023

• Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation Tim Bray
• Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation Roy T. Fielding
• Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation Lucas Pardue
• Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation Evert Pot
• Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation Lucas Pardue
• Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation gs-lists-ietf-http-wg@gluelogic.com
• Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation Tim Bray
• Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation Michael Sweet
• Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation Greg Wilkins
• Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation Graham Cox
• Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation Tim Bray
• Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation Stefan Eissing
• Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation Poul-Henning Kamp
• Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation Willy Tarreau
• Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation Poul-Henning Kamp
• Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation Mark Nottingham
• Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation Lucas Pardue
• Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC9110 (7419) Julian Reschke
• Re: Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation Poul-Henning Kamp
• Introducing a new HTTP response header for Carbon Emissions calculation Bertrand Martin
• [Technical Errata Reported] RFC9110 (7419) RFC Errata System

Monday, 10 April 2023

• Re: Httpdir early review of draft-ietf-alto-new-transport-07 Martin Thomson

Friday, 7 April 2023

• Re: [Last-Call] Httpdir telechat review of draft-ietf-masque-connect-ip-08 Mark Nottingham

Thursday, 6 April 2023

• Adoption of Alt-SvcB Eric Orth
• Re: Httpdir telechat review of draft-ietf-masque-connect-ip-08 David Schinazi
• Re: #2343 proposal: Display Strings Mark Nottingham

Wednesday, 5 April 2023

• Re: Httpdir telechat review of draft-ietf-oauth-step-up-authn-challenge-13 Brian Campbell
• Re: Httpdir telechat review of draft-ietf-oauth-step-up-authn-challenge-13 Mark Nottingham
• Re: Httpdir telechat review of draft-ietf-oauth-step-up-authn-challenge-13 Brian Campbell
• Re: Httpdir telechat review of draft-ietf-oauth-step-up-authn-challenge-13 Brian Campbell
• Re: [OAUTH-WG] Httpdir telechat review of draft-ietf-oauth-step-up-authn-challenge-13 Aaron Parecki
• Httpdir telechat review of draft-ietf-oauth-step-up-authn-challenge-13 Mark Nottingham via Datatracker
• Httpdir telechat review of draft-ietf-masque-connect-ip-08 Mark Nottingham via Datatracker

Tuesday, 4 April 2023

• Re: [alto] Httpdir early review of draft-ietf-alto-new-transport-07 Martin Thomson

Monday, 3 April 2023

• DRAFT minutes for IETF 116 Mark Nottingham

Saturday, 1 April 2023

• Re: HTTP over Delay-Tolerant Networks Greg Wilkins
• Re: #2343 proposal: Display Strings Martin Thomson

Last message date: Friday, 30 June 2023 22:06:54 UTC