- From: Roy T. Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2022 14:55:27 -0700
- To: Chris Smiley <csmiley@amsl.com>
- Cc: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>, Francesca Palombini <francesca.palombini@ericsson.com>, tsahara@iij.ad.jp, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
> On Aug 26, 2022, at 1:54 PM, Chris Smiley <csmiley@amsl.com> wrote: > > Greetings, > > We are unable to verify this erratum that the submitter marked as editorial. > Please note that we have changed the “Type” of the following errata > report to “Technical”. As Stream Approver, please review and set the > Status and Type accordingly (see the definitions at > https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata-definitions/). > > You may review the report at: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7105 > > Please see https://www.rfc-editor.org/how-to-verify/ for further > information on how to verify errata reports. > > Further information on errata can be found at: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata.php. > > Thank you. > > RFC Editor/xx Please restore the type to Editorial before verifying this errata. Change notes do not have a technical impact on the standard. ....Roy
Received on Tuesday, 13 September 2022 21:55:48 UTC