- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de>
- Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2022 11:29:13 +0200
- To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, fielding@gbiv.com, mnot@mnot.net, superuser@gmail.com, francesca.palombini@ericsson.com, tpauly@apple.com
- Cc: james.synge@gmail.com, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Am 31.08.2022 um 17:48 schrieb Julian Reschke: > Am 31.08.2022 um 17:42 schrieb RFC Errata System: >> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC9110, >> "HTTP Semantics". >> >> -------------------------------------- >> You may review the report below and at: >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7107 >> >> -------------------------------------- >> Type: Technical >> Reported by: James Synge <james.synge@gmail.com> >> >> Section: 6.5.1 >> >> Original Text >> ------------- >> For example, the chunked transfer coding in HTTP/1.1 >> allows a trailer section to be sent after the content >> (Section 7.1.2 of [HTTP/1.1]). >> >> Corrected Text >> -------------- >> For example, the chunked transfer coding in HTTP/1.1 >> allows a trailer section to be sent after the content >> (Section ?.?.? of [HTTP/1.1]). >> >> Notes >> ----- >> Section 7.1.2 does not exist. It isn't clear to me which section is >> the intended target of the reference. >> ... > > It does exist. See <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9112#section-7.1.2>. > > Best regards, Julian Dear RFC Editor, could you please close this erratum as "rejected"? Best regards, Julian -- <green/>bytes GmbH, Hafenweg 16, D-48155 Münster, Germany Amtsgericht Münster: HRB5782
Received on Tuesday, 13 September 2022 09:29:36 UTC