- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2022 17:18:17 +1000
- To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
- Cc: Tommy Pauly <tpauly@apple.com>
As editor of the spec, my current impression is that more people support the integer representation. Given that this is a predict-the-future-were-not-sure kind of question, I think that's probably the right direction to go, unless there are arguments or information that haven't surfaced yet. Anyone want to say anything else? Tommy, would you like to do a consensus call, or a hum at 115? If not, I'll just merge now. Cheers, > On 16 Jun 2022, at 11:54 am, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote: > > I'd love to hear what people think about this issue: > https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/2162 > > In a nutshell, the idea is to define a new structured type for dates, so that instead of e.g., > > SF-Date: 784072177 > > we'd have: > > SF-Date: @1994-11-06T08:49:37Z > > ...as the textual representation. Obviously, if we ever do binary structured fields, its representation there could be more efficient. > > Thoughts? > > -- > Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/ > > -- Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/
Received on Friday, 9 September 2022 07:18:36 UTC