Re: A structured format for dates?

--------
Mark Nottingham writes:
> Just a heads-up:
>
> I've linked a PR from the issue, to give people an idea of one way this might look.

I've commented in the issue, but the Tl;dr:

You have written it to preclude 00:00:60Z timestamps, which puts textual and sf-decimal
representation on feature-parity.  Therefore we should pick the simpler sf-decimal.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.

Received on Tuesday, 21 June 2022 07:29:22 UTC