- From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2022 06:53:59 +0000
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
-------- Mark Nottingham writes: > > > > On 17 Jun 2022, at 4:20 pm, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> = > wrote: > >=20 > > Introducing ISO 8601 as yet another textual timestamp format, > > offering no upside over the three already codified textual timestamp > > formats, would be not only pointless, it would be a regression, for > > instance in terms of HPACK efficiency. > > When it's textual, yes. If Binary Structured Fields happens, that's not > an issue. It will still be in log files, but that is of course "Somebody Elses Problem" :-) -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Friday, 17 June 2022 06:54:10 UTC