- From: Glenn Strauss <gs-lists-ietf-http-wg@gluelogic.com>
- Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2022 00:18:56 -0400
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 11:54:26AM +1000, Mark Nottingham wrote: > I'd love to hear what people think about this issue: > https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/2162 > > In a nutshell, the idea is to define a new structured type for dates, so that instead of e.g., > > SF-Date: 784072177 > > we'd have: > > SF-Date: @1994-11-06T08:49:37Z > > ...as the textual representation. Obviously, if we ever do binary structured fields, its representation there could be more efficient. > > Thoughts? +1 for ISO 8601 date format with 24-hour time notation (RFC 3339) (without the '@' ?) Preference: restrict SF-Date to UTC and strftime format "%FT%TZ" (written as "%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ" on ancient strftime impl, or MS) Cheers, Glenn
Received on Thursday, 16 June 2022 04:19:21 UTC