Re: Message signatures, structured fields and ABNF

• From: Roberto Polli <robipolli@gmail.com>
• Date: Mon, 30 May 2022 10:55:15 +0200
• To: Justin Richer <jricher@mit.edu>
• Cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, alex@flawedcode.org
• Message-ID: <CAP9qbHWsFCQXTOK=mfC3==Y-LOMrEeQ1KTqVjbemNcOQvita8g@mail.gmail.com>

Hi folks,

Mark wrote:
> The point of Structured Fields is that they're not strings, conceptually -- they're data structures.
> Eventually, we might come up with a simple schema language for them,
> but for now prose should be adequate

In this PR we tried to align with the latest  http admin editorial guidelines
defining concepts like quota-policy as data structures and reusing them in
fields.

- https://github.com/ietf-wg-httpapi/ratelimit-headers/pull/90

Editorial feedback is very welcome, since this work can be useful
even in other specs.

Thx++,
R & A

Received on Monday, 30 May 2022 08:55:38 UTC