W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2022

Re: AD Review of draft-ietf-httpbis-binary-message-03

From: Francesca Palombini <francesca.palombini@ericsson.com>
Date: Mon, 23 May 2022 12:52:58 +0000
To: Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>, "draft-ietf-httpbis-binary-message@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-httpbis-binary-message@ietf.org>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <AS1PR07MB86161803334D809137F345D198D49@AS1PR07MB8616.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Hi Martin,

Actionable is the goal :) Thank you for addressing them, looks good. Feel free to merge and submit a new version, so that Last Call reviewer will read the latest version.


From: Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>
Date: Monday, 23 May 2022 at 03:24
To: Francesca Palombini <francesca.palombini@ericsson.com>, draft-ietf-httpbis-binary-message@ietf.org <draft-ietf-httpbis-binary-message@ietf.org>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Subject: Re: AD Review of draft-ietf-httpbis-binary-message-03
Thanks for the review Francesca.

Mark helpfully generated issues for this, but most of these are so trivial (and easy to act upon, which is very much appreciated) that I just fixed them in a single pull request:


I've separated out the question about final and information responses into a separate pull request as that required writing a sentence:


On Sat, May 21, 2022, at 00:44, Francesca Palombini wrote:
> ## Notes
> This review is in the ["IETF Comments" Markdown format][ICMF], You can use the
> [`ietf-comments` tool][ICT] to automatically convert this review into
> individual GitHub issues.
> [ICMF]: https://github.com/mnot/ietf-comments/blob/main/format.md
> [ICT]: https://github.com/mnot/ietf-comments
Received on Monday, 23 May 2022 12:53:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:44:07 UTC