W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2021

Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-priority-10

From: Lucas Pardue <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2021 23:35:50 +0000
Message-ID: <CALGR9oZp+dJObO1BeTKJcQdcx0zGKXRC=kZuDKRUcNeeKoZW5Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ines Robles <mariainesrobles@googlemail.com>
Cc: gen-art@ietf.org, draft-ietf-httpbis-priority.all@ietf.org, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, last-call@ietf.org
Hi Ines,

Thank you for the review and providing feedback.

On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 8:42 PM Ines Robles via Datatracker <
noreply@ietf.org> wrote:

> Reviewer: Ines Robles
> Review result: Ready with Nits
>
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
> like any other last call comments.
>
> For more information, please see the FAQ at
>
> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
>
> Document: draft-ietf-httpbis-priority-10
> Reviewer: Ines Robles
> Review Date: 2021-11-29
> IETF LC End Date: 2021-11-29
> IESG Telechat date: 2022-01-06
>
> Summary:
>
> The document describes a scheme that allows an HTTP client to communicate
> its
> preferences for how the upstream server prioritizes responses to its
> requests,
> and also allows a server to hint to a downstream intermediary how its
> responses
> should be prioritized when they are forwarded.
>
> The document does not present major issues, just one minor nit.
>
> Major issues: None
>
> Minor issues: None
>
> Nits/editorial comments:
>
> Page 6: "Multiple experiments from independent research have shown" -->
> please
> add references to this claim
>

Please see https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/pull/1800 which
addresses this nit

Cheers,
Lucas
Received on Monday, 29 November 2021 23:36:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 29 November 2021 23:36:16 UTC