- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Sun, 30 May 2021 18:43:44 +0200
- To: Mohit Sethi M <mohit.m.sethi@ericsson.com>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Am 30.05.2021 um 18:37 schrieb Mohit Sethi M: > > On 5/30/21 7:25 PM, Julian Reschke wrote: >> Am 30.05.2021 um 18:15 schrieb Mohit Sethi M: >>> ... >>>> Which specific HTML version did you use, and what was the problem? >>> >>> When I click on the link for [Semantics]: >>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-16#ref-Semantics >>> >>> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-16#ref-Semantics>, >>> >>> I am not taken to the section on normative references (as one would >>> expect). Instead, the link points to section 1.2? It works fine in this >>> html version: >>> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-16.html#Semantics >>> >>> <https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-16.html#Semantics>. >>> >>> ... >> >> The first of these two is generated by a tool based on the plain text >> version. That tools ocassionally gets things wrong; known issue with the >> tool, not with the spec. > > I did write in my review that the source looks fine and I suspect it is > something to do with the tooling. > ... Yep, and thanks for the review. As it happens I'm interested in the tools as well, thus I wanted to understand what was wrong. Best regards, Julian
Received on Sunday, 30 May 2021 16:44:02 UTC