W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2021

HTTP Signatures Updates

From: Justin Richer <jricher@mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2021 12:55:31 -0400
Message-Id: <0801418F-6D92-4718-9FF9-98BA0BFCC611@mit.edu>
To: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
The editors of the HTTP Message Signatures spec wanted to let the group know that with the recent publication of -04, we believe the major surgical changes from the input community drafts have been completed and it’s a newly stable base:

https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-04.html <https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-04.html>

The major changes revolve around adopting structured fields as the basis for both signature base string creation as well as signature header contents. With these, we now have a way to discuss things in terms of structures with well-defined serializations, which is vital for good security. This has let us do things like cover signature parameters and pave the way for multiple signatures in a single request. We’ve also changed out the perspective of the protocol from something that was solely focused on a header format to something that deals with signatures and signing algorithms more holistically. Specifically, where there once was a required “algorithm” parameter that defined actions, there are now a set of requirements for defining algorithm and key resolution with the parameter as one input. 

What does this mean? For one, we aren’t saying it’s done or that it’s perfect: there are still plenty of rough edges that need to be sanded, lots of language that isn’t quite fully accurate yet (headers vs fields, for instance), and I’m sure a few missing features. I’m sure we’ll still bike shed a few things and possibly tweak the syntax. But all that said, we don’t anticipate the kinds of major architectural changes. Now is the time for the working group to dig into it, try it out, figure out what the edges are, and define this more concretely.

So while we don’t think it’s ready for WGLC yet, we would like to get more eyes on the text and help keep pushing it forward. Please review the draft, help file issues (and/or PRs), and try to build the blasted thing. I’ve implemented the current draft myself on a couple platforms, and I’ve been seeing other implementers tracking it as well. It’s encouraging to see running code on this at this stage.


Thanks,
 — Justin
Received on Tuesday, 27 April 2021 16:55:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 27 April 2021 16:55:46 UTC