Re: Re-WGLC for BCP65bis

> On Apr 2, 2021, at 7:57 AM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
> 
> Am 01.04.2021 um 19:31 schrieb Tommy Pauly:
>> Hello all,
>> 
>> Now that the core documents have been completed, it’s time for us to
>> un-park draft-ietf-httpbis-bcp56bis and progress it along towards
>> publication.
>> 
>> However, you may note that it’s been a couple years since our last
>> working group last call on this document, so I’d like to have the WG
>> take another quick review of the document before moving it along. It has
>> a few updates, which largely get it inline with the core documents.
>> 
>> The current version is here:
>> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-httpbis-bcp56bis-11.html
>> <https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-httpbis-bcp56bis-11.html>
>> 
>> You can see a diff between the older version here:
>> https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?difftype=--hwdiff&url2=draft-ietf-httpbis-bcp56bis-11.txt
>> <https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?difftype=--hwdiff&url2=draft-ietf-httpbis-bcp56bis-11.txt>
>> ...
> 
> The last WGLC version was -08, so maybe the diff with that version is
> more interesting...:
> 
> <https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-httpbis-bcp56bis-08.txt&url2=https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-httpbis-bcp56bis-11.txt>

Thanks Julian! That was my mistake in the diff URL; I had intended to diff to that older version.

Best,
Tommy
> 
> Best regards, Julian
> 

Received on Friday, 2 April 2021 15:26:46 UTC