ietf-http-wg@w3.org from October to December 2020 by date

Tuesday, 29 December 2020

• Re: Digest: use in requests Julian Reschke
• Re: Digest: use in requests Lucas Pardue
• Re: Digest: use in requests Lucas Pardue
• Re: Digest: use in requests Julian Reschke
• Re: Digest: use in requests Roberto Polli

Monday, 28 December 2020

• Re: Digest: use in requests Julian Reschke
• Digest: use in requests Roberto Polli
• Digest Headers: digest-algorithms "last call" Roberto Polli

Sunday, 27 December 2020

• Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) Repository Activity Summary Bot
• httpbis - Not having a session at IETF 110 IETF Meeting Session Request Tool

Saturday, 26 December 2020

• Re: Question regarding RFC 7231 Accept header Julian Reschke
• Question regarding RFC 7231 Accept header Elviss Strazdins

Wednesday, 23 December 2020

• Re: Call for Adoption: HTTP/2 Bis Mark Nottingham

Tuesday, 22 December 2020

• Re: Call for Adoption: HTTP/2 Bis Cory Benfield
• Re: 0-RTT Design for HTTP/2 Cory Benfield

Monday, 21 December 2020

• Re: Call for Adoption: HTTP/2 Bis Dmitri Tikhonov
• Re: 0-RTT Design for HTTP/2 Ian Swett
• Re: 0-RTT Design for HTTP/2 Martin Thomson
• Re: 0-RTT Design for HTTP/2 Willy Tarreau

Sunday, 20 December 2020

• Re: Priority signals in HTTP/2 Martin Thomson
• Re: Priority signals in HTTP/2 Martin Thomson
• Re: 0-RTT Design for HTTP/2 Martin Thomson
• Re: 0-RTT Design for HTTP/2 Martin Thomson
• Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) Repository Activity Summary Bot
• Re: Call for Adoption: HTTP/2 Bis Willy Tarreau

Saturday, 19 December 2020

• Re: Call for Adoption: HTTP/2 Bis Tommy Pauly
• Re: Call for Adoption: HTTP/2 Bis Ian Swett
• Re: 0-RTT Design for HTTP/2 Ian Swett
• Re: 0-RTT Design for HTTP/2 Willy Tarreau
• Re: Priority signals in HTTP/2 Willy Tarreau
• Re: Priority signals in HTTP/2 Greg Wilkins

Friday, 18 December 2020

• Re: Priority signals in HTTP/2 Lucas Pardue
• Status update on Extensible Priorities Lucas Pardue
• Re: Priority signals in HTTP/2 Robin MARX
• Re: Priority signals in HTTP/2 Cory Benfield
• Re: [TLS] ALPS and TLS 1.3 half-RTT data Cory Benfield
• Priority signals in HTTP/2 Martin Thomson

Thursday, 17 December 2020

• Re: Call for Adoption: HTTP/2 Bis Tommy Pauly
• Re: 0-RTT Design for HTTP/2 Martin Thomson
• RE: 0-RTT Design for HTTP/2 Mike Bishop
• Re: 0-RTT Design for HTTP/2 David Schinazi
• Re: Are accept-extension parameters used in practice? Julian Reschke
• Re: 0-RTT Design for HTTP/2 Martin Thomson

Wednesday, 16 December 2020

• Re: 0-RTT Design for HTTP/2 David Schinazi
• Re: 0-RTT Design for HTTP/2 Ian Swett
• Re: 0-RTT Design for HTTP/2 Cory Benfield
• Re: [TLS] ALPS and TLS 1.3 half-RTT data Cory Benfield
• 0-RTT Design for HTTP/2 Martin Thomson

Tuesday, 15 December 2020

• [Errata Rejected] RFC7231 (6354) RFC Errata System

Monday, 14 December 2020

• RE: Call for Adoption: HTTP/2 Bis Mike Bishop
• RE: Call for Adoption: HTTP/2 Bis Mike Bishop
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-13.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-messaging-13.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-semantics-13.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org

Sunday, 13 December 2020

• Re: Call for Adoption: HTTP/2 Bis Julian Reschke
• Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) Repository Activity Summary Bot

Friday, 11 December 2020

• Re: Call for Adoption: HTTP/2 Bis Willy Tarreau
• Re: Call for Adoption: HTTP/2 Bis Bence Béky
• Re: Call for Adoption: HTTP/2 Bis Stefan Eissing
• Re: Call for Adoption: HTTP/2 Bis Willy Tarreau
• Re: [TLS] ALPS and TLS 1.3 half-RTT data Victor Vasiliev
• Re: Are accept-extension parameters used in practice? Mark Nottingham
• Re: Call for Adoption: HTTP/2 Bis Mark Nottingham

Thursday, 10 December 2020

• RE: Call for Adoption: HTTP/2 Bis Mike Bishop
• Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7231 (6354) Julian Reschke
• [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7231 (6354) RFC Errata System
• Re: Are accept-extension parameters used in practice? Roy T. Fielding
• Re: Are accept-extension parameters used in practice? Willy Tarreau
• Are accept-extension parameters used in practice? Julian Reschke
• Re: ALPS and TLS 1.3 half-RTT data Martin Thomson

Tuesday, 8 December 2020

• Re: Call for Adoption: HTTP/2 Bis Ian Swett
• Re: Call for Adoption: HTTP/2 Bis David Benjamin
• Re: Call for Adoption: HTTP/2 Bis Cory Benfield
• Re: [TLS] ALPS and TLS 1.3 half-RTT data Cory Benfield

Monday, 7 December 2020

• WebRTC, Ingest Signaling over HTTPS (WISH) WG charter Sergio Garcia Murillo
• Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-07.txt Mike West
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-07.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org

Sunday, 6 December 2020

• Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) Repository Activity Summary Bot
• Re: Call for Adoption: HTTP/2 Bis Roy T. Fielding

Saturday, 5 December 2020

• Re: Call for Adoption: HTTP/2 Bis Mark Nottingham

Friday, 4 December 2020

• Re: Call for Adoption: HTTP/2 Bis Willy Tarreau
• Re: Call for Adoption: HTTP/2 Bis Roy T. Fielding
• Re: "redirect" files? Julian Reschke
• "redirect" files? Soni L.

Thursday, 3 December 2020

• ALPS and TLS 1.3 half-RTT data David Benjamin
• Re: Call for Adoption: HTTP/2 Bis Stefan Eissing
• Re: Call for Adoption: HTTP/2 Bis Daniel Stenberg
• Re: Call for Adoption: HTTP/2 Bis Willy Tarreau
• Re: Call for Adoption: HTTP/2 Bis Willy Tarreau
• Re: Call for Adoption: HTTP/2 Bis Ian Swett
• Call for Adoption: HTTP/2 Bis Mark Nottingham

Wednesday, 2 December 2020

• Re: Call for Adoption: SEARCH method James M Snell
• On RFC7725bis Mark Nottingham
• Re: Call for Adoption: SEARCH method Tommy Pauly
• Re: Call for Adoption: Cookie Incrementalism Tommy Pauly
• Re: Call for Adoption: SEARCH method Mitar

Sunday, 29 November 2020

• Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) Repository Activity Summary Bot

Friday, 27 November 2020

• Re: Call for Adoption: SEARCH method Philippe Mougin
• Re: Call for Adoption: SEARCH method Julian Reschke
• Re: Call for Adoption: SEARCH method Asbjørn Ulsberg

Tuesday, 24 November 2020

• Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-cdn-control-header-00.txt Mark Nottingham

Monday, 23 November 2020

• Re: The future of qlog Lucas Pardue
• Re: The future of qlog Robin MARX

Sunday, 22 November 2020

• Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) Repository Activity Summary Bot

Friday, 20 November 2020

• Re: Call for Adoption: Cookie Incrementalism John Wilander

Thursday, 19 November 2020

• Re: Call for Adoption: SEARCH method James M Snell
• Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7230 (6333) Julian Reschke
• Re: Call for Adoption: SEARCH method James Fuller
• Re: Call for Adoption: SEARCH method Julian Reschke
• Re: Call for Adoption: SEARCH method Julian Reschke
• Re: Call for Adoption: SEARCH method Julian Reschke
• Re: Call for Adoption: SEARCH method James Fuller
• Re: Call for Adoption: SEARCH method Greg Wilkins
• Re: Call for Adoption: SEARCH method James Fuller
• Re: Call for Adoption: SEARCH method Philippe Mougin
• Re: Call for Adoption: SEARCH method Julian Reschke
• Re: Call for Adoption: SEARCH method Martin Thomson
• Re: Call for Adoption: SEARCH method Julian Reschke
• Re: Call for Adoption: SEARCH method Nick Harper
• Re: Call for Adoption: SEARCH method Julian Reschke
• Re: Call for Adoption: SEARCH method James M Snell

Wednesday, 18 November 2020

• Re: Call for Adoption: SEARCH method Philippe Mougin
• Re: Call for Adoption: SEARCH method Julian Reschke
• Re: Call for Adoption: SEARCH method Philippe Mougin

Tuesday, 17 November 2020

• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-01.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org
• Re: Considering RFC7725bis Mark Nottingham

Sunday, 15 November 2020

• Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) Repository Activity Summary Bot

Saturday, 14 November 2020

• Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7230 (6333) Willy Tarreau
• Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7230 (6333) Martin J. Dürst
• Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7230 (6333) Willy Tarreau

Friday, 13 November 2020

• [Errata Rejected] RFC7230 (6333) RFC Errata System
• Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7230 (6333) Barry Leiba
• Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7230 (6333) Julian Reschke
• Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7230 (6333) Julian Reschke
• [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7230 (6333) RFC Errata System
• Re: Call for Adoption: Cookie Incrementalism Mike Taylor
• Re: Call for Adoption: Cookie Incrementalism David Benjamin
• Re: Call for Adoption: Cookie Incrementalism Lily Chen
• Re: RFC7725bis new elements Shivan Kaul Sahib
• Re: Call for Adoption: Cookie Incrementalism Amos Jeffries
• Re: Call for Adoption: Cookie Incrementalism Daniel Stenberg
• Re: Call for Adoption: Cookie Incrementalism Willy Tarreau
• Re: Call for Adoption: Cookie Incrementalism Martin Thomson
• [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC7233 (5620) RFC Errata System
• Re: Call for Adoption: Cookie Incrementalism Ian Swett
• Re: Call for Adoption: Cookie Incrementalism Brad Lassey

Thursday, 12 November 2020

• Call for Adoption: Cookie Incrementalism Mark Nottingham
• Re: Considering RFC7725bis Ben Schwartz
• Re: Considering RFC7725bis Roberto Polli
• Re: RFC7725bis new elements Mark Nottingham
• Re: RFC7725bis new elements Tim Bray
• RFC7725bis new elements Tim Bray

Wednesday, 11 November 2020

• Considering RFC7725bis Mark Nottingham

Tuesday, 10 November 2020

• TCP and UDP over HTTP Soni L.

Sunday, 8 November 2020

• Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) Repository Activity Summary Bot

Friday, 6 November 2020

• Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Call for Adoption: SEARCH method Glenn Block
• Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Call for Adoption: SEARCH method Glenn Block
• Re: Call for Adoption: SEARCH method James M Snell
• Re: Call for Adoption: SEARCH method Ben Schwartz
• Re: Call for Adoption: SEARCH method Mark Nottingham
• Re: Call for Adoption: SEARCH method Ben Schwartz
• Re: Call for Adoption: SEARCH method James M Snell
• Re: Call for Adoption: SEARCH method Nick Harper
• Re: Call for Adoption: SEARCH method Julian Reschke
• Re: Call for Adoption: SEARCH method Michael Douglass
• Re: For discussion: scope for AltSvc and ORIGIN bis efforts Erik Nygren

Thursday, 5 November 2020

• Re: How to express no matching results in HTTP SEARH method? Roy T. Fielding
• RE: For discussion: scope for AltSvc and ORIGIN bis efforts Mike Bishop
• RE: Call for Adoption: SEARCH method Mike Bishop
• RE: How to express no matching results in HTTP SEARH method? Mike Bishop
• Re: Call for Adoption: SEARCH method Julian Reschke
• Re: How to express no matching results in HTTP SEARH method? Roy T. Fielding
• Re: Call for Adoption: SEARCH method Michael Douglass
• Re: How to express no matching results in HTTP SEARH method? Ben Schwartz
• Re: How to express no matching results in HTTP SEARH method? Roy T. Fielding
• Re: Call for Adoption: SEARCH method Henry Story
• Re: Call for Adoption: SEARCH method Ben Schwartz

Wednesday, 4 November 2020

• Call for Adoption: SEARCH method Glenn Block

Thursday, 5 November 2020

• Re: [EXTERNAL] Call for Adoption: SEARCH method Glenn Block

Wednesday, 4 November 2020

• Re: Call for Adoption: SEARCH method Glenn Block

Thursday, 5 November 2020

• Re: How to express no matching results in HTTP SEARH method? Julian Reschke
• Re: How to express no matching results in HTTP SEARH method? Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: Call for Adoption: SEARCH method James Fuller
• Re: Call for Adoption: SEARCH method Julian Reschke
• Re: Call for Adoption: SEARCH method James Fuller
• Re: For discussion: scope for AltSvc and ORIGIN bis efforts Daniel Stenberg
• Re: Call for Adoption: SEARCH method Greg Wilkins
• Re: How to express no matching results in HTTP SEARH method? Willy Tarreau
• Re: How to express no matching results in HTTP SEARH method? Henry Story
• Re: Call for Adoption: SEARCH method Henry Story
• Re: How to express no matching results in HTTP SEARH method? Austin Wright
• Re: For discussion: scope for AltSvc and ORIGIN bis efforts Martin Thomson

Wednesday, 4 November 2020

• Re: For discussion: scope for AltSvc and ORIGIN bis efforts Lucas Pardue
• For discussion: scope for AltSvc and ORIGIN bis efforts Mark Nottingham
• Re: How to express no matching results in HTTP SEARH method? Carsten Bormann
• Re: Call for Adoption: SEARCH method Guilherme Hermeto
• Re: How to express no matching results in HTTP SEARH method? Austin Wright
• Re: Call for Adoption: SEARCH method Austin Wright
• Re: How to express no matching results in HTTP SEARH method? Willy Tarreau
• Re: How to express no matching results in HTTP SEARH method? Poul-Henning Kamp
• Re: How to express no matching results in HTTP SEARH method? Julian Reschke
• Re: How to express no matching results in HTTP SEARH method? Roberto Polli
• Re: How to express no matching results in HTTP SEARH method? James M Snell
• Re: How to express no matching results in HTTP SEARH method? Julian Reschke
• Re: How to express no matching results in HTTP SEARH method? Poul-Henning Kamp
• Re: How to express no matching results in HTTP SEARH method? Julian Reschke
• Re: How to express no matching results in HTTP SEARH method? Julian Reschke
• Re: How to express no matching results in HTTP SEARH method? Sawood Alam
• Re: How to express no matching results in HTTP SEARH method? Poul-Henning Kamp
• Re: Call for Adoption: SEARCH method Julian Reschke
• Re: How to express no matching results in HTTP SEARH method? Julian Reschke
• Re: Call for Adoption: SEARCH method Roberto Polli
• Re: A typo in the HTTP SEARCH method draft Julian Reschke
• Re: Call for Adoption: SEARCH method Cory Benfield
• Re: Call for Adoption: SEARCH method Willy Tarreau
• Re: Call for Adoption: SEARCH method Mark Nottingham
• Re: Call for Adoption: SEARCH method Willy Tarreau
• How to express no matching results in HTTP SEARH method? Sawood Alam
• Re: A typo in the HTTP SEARCH method draft Sawood Alam
• A typo in the HTTP SEARCH method draft Sawood Alam
• Call for Adoption: SEARCH method Mark Nottingham

Sunday, 1 November 2020

• Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) Repository Activity Summary Bot

Friday, 23 October 2020

• RE: H2 vs responses which should not carry any payload Eric Lawrence

Friday, 30 October 2020

• Pre-adoption work on HTTP/2bis Mark Nottingham

Thursday, 29 October 2020

• Re: Structured Fields: whitespace in binary content Willy Tarreau
• Re: Structured Fields: whitespace in binary content Mark Nottingham
• Re: Structured Fields: whitespace in binary content Roy T. Fielding

Wednesday, 28 October 2020

• Re: Structured Fields: whitespace in binary content Mark Nottingham
• Re: Structured Fields: whitespace in binary content Nick Harper
• Re: Structured Fields: whitespace in binary content Ian Clelland
• Re: Structured Fields: whitespace in binary content Cory Benfield
• Re: Structured Fields: whitespace in binary content Mark Nottingham
• Re: Structured Fields: whitespace in binary content Matthew Kerwin
• Re: Structured Fields: whitespace in binary content Julian Reschke
• Re: Structured Fields: whitespace in binary content Poul-Henning Kamp
• Structured Fields: whitespace in binary content Mark Nottingham

Tuesday, 27 October 2020

• [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC7540 (6309) RFC Errata System

Sunday, 25 October 2020

• Re: H2 vs responses which should not carry any payload Willy Tarreau
• Re: H2 vs responses which should not carry any payload Greg Wilkins
• Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) Repository Activity Summary Bot

Saturday, 24 October 2020

• Re: H2 vs responses which should not carry any payload Willy Tarreau
• Re: H2 vs responses which should not carry any payload Mark Nottingham

Friday, 23 October 2020

• RE: H2 vs responses which should not carry any payload Mike Bishop
• Re: H2 vs responses which should not carry any payload Willy Tarreau
• Re: H2 vs responses which should not carry any payload Bence Béky
• Re: H2 vs responses which should not carry any payload Willy Tarreau
• Re: H2 vs responses which should not carry any payload Bence Béky
• H2 vs responses which should not carry any payload Willy Tarreau
• DRAFT minutes from the October 2020 interim Mark Nottingham

Wednesday, 21 October 2020

• FYI: Update on cache tests Mark Nottingham

Tuesday, 20 October 2020

• Re: Interested in working on draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures Mark Nottingham
• Interested in working on draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures Orie Steele

Monday, 19 October 2020

• Reminder: HTTP WG Interim meetings this week Mark Nottingham
• [Errata Rejected] RFC7235 (6307) RFC Errata System
• [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7540 (6309) RFC Errata System

Sunday, 18 October 2020

• Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) Repository Activity Summary Bot

Saturday, 17 October 2020

• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers-04.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org

Friday, 16 October 2020

• Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7235 (6307) Mark Nottingham
• Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7235 (6307) Barry Leiba
• Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7235 (6307) Mark Nottingham

Thursday, 15 October 2020

• Re: Optional Connection fields in 1xx messages and Upgrade requests Alex Rousskov
• Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7235 (6307) Julian Reschke
• [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7235 (6307) RFC Errata System
• Re: Optional Connection fields in 1xx messages and Upgrade requests Willy Tarreau
• Re: Optional Connection fields in 1xx messages and Upgrade requests Mark Nottingham
• Re: Optional Connection fields in 1xx messages and Upgrade requests Willy Tarreau

Wednesday, 14 October 2020

• Optional Connection fields in 1xx messages and Upgrade requests Alex Rousskov

Sunday, 11 October 2020

• Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) Repository Activity Summary Bot

Thursday, 8 October 2020

• HTTP (httpbis) WG Virtual Meeting: 2020-10-22 IESG Secretary
• HTTP (httpbis) WG Virtual Meeting: 2020-10-20 IESG Secretary

Wednesday, 7 October 2020

• Re: Digests: deprecating parameters? Roberto Polli

Monday, 5 October 2020

• Re: Structured Fields: last-minute corrections Matthew Kerwin
• Re: Structured Fields: last-minute corrections Tommy Pauly
• Re: Structured Fields: last-minute corrections Julian Reschke
• Re: Structured Fields: last-minute corrections Mark Nottingham
• Re: Structured Fields: last-minute corrections Julian Reschke
• Structured Fields: last-minute corrections Mark Nottingham

Sunday, 4 October 2020

• Upcoming interim meeting Mark Nottingham
• Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) Repository Activity Summary Bot

Friday, 2 October 2020

• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-12.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-semantics-12.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-messaging-12.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org
• Re: Redirections to `Content-Encoding: encrypted` payloads Mike Bishop

Thursday, 1 October 2020

• Re: Redirections to `Content-Encoding: encrypted` payloads W. Felix Handte
• Redirections to `Content-Encoding: encrypted` payloads alex@strugee.net
• HTTP WG meeting at IETF 109? Dmitri Tikhonov
• Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-httpbis-priority-02.txt Lucas Pardue
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-priority-02.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org

Last message date: Tuesday, 29 December 2020 13:39:08 UTC