- From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
- Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2020 13:27:08 +0200
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 12:59:03PM +0200, Julian Reschke wrote: > Am 28.08.2020 um 09:15 schrieb Martin Thomson: > > All this tiresome talk about terminology got me thinking about the value of action over words. > > > > So, I present to you a proposed update to RFC 7540: > > > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-thomson-httpbis-http2bis-00 > > > > This only does: > > > > * removes unnecessarily divisive terminology > > * rolls up errata > > > > Obviously, there is a long and slippery slope of things that we might do from this point. However, I think that it would be good if we could just publish a minimal update without getting embroiled in difficult and time-consuming design questions. > > > > The diff is mostly just stuff that xml2rfc does differently five years on: > > > > https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=https://ietf.org/rfc/rfc7540.txt&url2=https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-thomson-httpbis-http2bis-00.txt > > > > Or you can peruse the individual changes I made: > > > > https://github.com/http2/http2-spec/compare/master...martinthomson:main > > +1 > > Actually, I was going to suggest that as well, but mainly to align > HTTP/2 with the new core specs - it would be good to say how the cleanup > affects the references from HTTP/2. +1 as well. Wouldn't it be an opportunity to also reference (or even merge) the extensions such as RFC8441 which adds the ":protocol" pseudo-header ? Willy
Received on Friday, 28 August 2020 11:27:26 UTC