- From: Roberto Polli <robipolli@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2020 10:49:18 +0100
- To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
- Cc: Alex Martinez <amartine@redhat.com>
- Message-ID: <CAP9qbHVOGx3JxKVT7-3VjO+bZAdQ1aCSgnBbugs1q-_Dc=LT=w@mail.gmail.com>
Dear all, me, Alex and the community are continuing our work on ratelimit headers. Here you can find the updates, your feedback is precious to move on with the spec :) ## Implementors Following the advices coming from IETF-106 we got more support from API Gateway implementors: - Azure API Gateway added some features to expose ratelimit counters, so you can use them to implement this specification [1] - Kong 2.0.0 implemented the specification and supports now providing the mandatory part of the headers [2] - Express-Gateway, a nodejs gateway with more than 2k stars on github is working on that. You can test it using this docker image [3] ## Intermediaries and Caching We have a PR [4] on Intermediaries and Caching, and got some useful feedback from Martin and Erik (thanks!). Further feedbacks are really appreciated, especially on Caching! ## Scope After Roy's comment, I made a proposal for addressing the scope issue in a way that is consistent with Retry-After [5]. If that won't work, we could address that only in ratelimit spec passing the scope as an header parameter [6]. Thanks for all your guidance and support, R. [1]: https://azure.microsoft.com/en-ca/updates/azure-api-management-update-january-2020/ [2]: https://github.com/Kong/kong/pull/5335 [3]: https://github.com/ioggstream/docker-express-gateway-ratelimit [4]: https://github.com/ioggstream/draft-polli-ratelimit-headers/pull/76 [5]: https://github.com/httpwg/http-core/pull/317#issuecomment-585634120 [6]: https://github.com/ioggstream/draft-polli-ratelimit-headers/pull/79/files
Received on Thursday, 13 February 2020 09:49:44 UTC