- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 09:04:46 +0100
- To: Daniel Stenberg <daniel@haxx.se>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 21.01.2020 08:46, Daniel Stenberg wrote: > On Mon, 20 Jan 2020, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote: > > Section 2.3 says: > >> The term "public suffix" is defined in a note in Section 5.3 of >> [RFC6265] as "a domain that is controlled by a public registry", and >> are also known as "effective top-level domains" (eTLDs). For >> example, "site.example"'s public suffix is "com". > > This confuses me greatly. Is this a typo? Surely "site.example"'s public > suffice is "example" ? How is that related to "com" ? > > The following paragraph seems to have got it right. Seems to be an editorial mistake when addressing <https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/pull/1017>. Now another question is why this references RFC6265??? (That problem goes back further). Best regards, Julian
Received on Tuesday, 21 January 2020 08:04:58 UTC