ietf-http-wg@w3.org from April to June 2020 by date

Tuesday, 30 June 2020

Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers: Digests and Conditional Requests Julian Reschke
Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers: Digests and Conditional Requests Roberto Polli
draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers: Digests and Conditional Requests Julian Reschke

Sunday, 28 June 2020

Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) Repository Activity Summary Bot

Saturday, 27 June 2020

Re: [TLS] something something certificate --- boiling a small lake Nico Williams

Friday, 26 June 2020

Re: [TLS] something something certificate --- boiling a small lake Nico Williams

Tuesday, 23 June 2020

Re: nearing completion for HTTPS RR type (and SVCB RR type) Mark Andrews
Re: nearing completion for HTTPS RR type (and SVCB RR type) Mark Andrews

Thursday, 25 June 2020

Re: [TLS] something something certificate --- boiling a small lake Nico Williams
Re: something something certificate --- boiling a small lake Brian Campbell
Re: HTTP extensions, semantics and HTTP datagrams / MASQUE / WEBTRANS Lucas Pardue
Re: nearing completion for HTTPS RR type (and SVCB RR type) Martin Thomson
Re: nearing completion for HTTPS RR type (and SVCB RR type) Ben Schwartz
Re: HTTP extensions, semantics and HTTP datagrams / MASQUE / WEBTRANS Eric Kinnear
Re: HTTP extensions, semantics and HTTP datagrams / MASQUE / WEBTRANS Ben Schwartz

Wednesday, 24 June 2020

Re: HTTP extensions, semantics and HTTP datagrams / MASQUE / WEBTRANS Mark Nottingham
Re: HTTP extensions, semantics and HTTP datagrams / MASQUE / WEBTRANS Mark Nottingham
Re: HTTP extensions, semantics and HTTP datagrams / MASQUE / WEBTRANS David Schinazi
Re: HTTP extensions, semantics and HTTP datagrams / MASQUE / WEBTRANS Ben Schwartz

Tuesday, 23 June 2020

Re: nearing completion for HTTPS RR type (and SVCB RR type) Stephen Farrell
Re: nearing completion for HTTPS RR type (and SVCB RR type) Tommy Pauly
Re: nearing completion for HTTPS RR type (and SVCB RR type) Martin Thomson
Re: nearing completion for HTTPS RR type (and SVCB RR type) Tommy Pauly
Re: nearing completion for HTTPS RR type (and SVCB RR type) Martin Thomson
Re: HTTP extensions, semantics and HTTP datagrams / MASQUE / WEBTRANS Mark Nottingham
Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-08.txt Mark Nottingham
Re: nearing completion for HTTPS RR type (and SVCB RR type) Mark Nottingham
Re: Prefer: return=representation and caching Mark Nottingham

Monday, 22 June 2020

HTTP extensions, semantics and HTTP datagrams / MASQUE / WEBTRANS Mark Nottingham
Re: Structured request headers deployment issues Mike West
Re: Structured request headers deployment issues Mark Nottingham

Sunday, 21 June 2020

Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) Repository Activity Summary Bot

Saturday, 20 June 2020

Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization Patrick Meenan

Friday, 19 June 2020

Re: Priority implementation complexity (was: Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization) Lucas Pardue
Re: Priority implementation complexity (was: Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization) Tom Bergan
Re: Priority implementation complexity (was: Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization) Lucas Pardue
Re: Priority implementation complexity (was: Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization) Tom Bergan
Re: Priority implementation complexity (was: Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization) Lucas Pardue
Re: Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-14: (with COMMENT) Yoav Weiss
Re: Structured request headers deployment issues Yoav Weiss
Re: Structured request headers deployment issues Yoav Weiss
Re: Structured request headers deployment issues Mike West
Re: Structured request headers deployment issues Mark Nottingham
Re: Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-14: (with COMMENT) Benjamin Kaduk
Re: Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-14: (with COMMENT) Mark Nottingham

Thursday, 18 June 2020

Re: Magnus Westerlund's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-14: (with COMMENT) Magnus Westerlund
Re: Structured request headers deployment issues Yoav Weiss
Re: Structured request headers deployment issues Julian Reschke
Re: Magnus Westerlund's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-14: (with COMMENT) Yoav Weiss
Re: Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-14: (with COMMENT) Yoav Weiss
Re: Magnus Westerlund's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-14: (with COMMENT) Julian Reschke
Re: Magnus Westerlund's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-14: (with COMMENT) Magnus Westerlund
nearing completion for HTTPS RR type (and SVCB RR type) Erik Nygren

Wednesday, 17 June 2020

Tuesday, 16 June 2020

Re: Priority implementation complexity (was: Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization) Barry Pollard

Monday, 15 June 2020

Re: Priority implementation complexity (was: Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization) Barry Pollard

Tuesday, 16 June 2020

Monday, 15 June 2020

Sunday, 14 June 2020

Prefer: return=representation and caching Ken Murchison
Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-08.txt Ken Murchison
Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) Repository Activity Summary Bot
Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-08.txt Amos Jeffries

Saturday, 13 June 2020

Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-08.txt Ken Murchison

Thursday, 11 June 2020

RFC7616 uri= vs request-target etc Joe Orton
Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-semantics-08.txt Ken Murchison
Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-semantics-08.txt Julian Reschke
Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-semantics-08.txt Ken Murchison
Re: Priority implementation complexity (was: Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization) Kazuho Oku
Re: Priority implementation complexity (was: Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization) Martin Thomson
Re: Priority implementation complexity (was: Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization) Yoav Weiss

Wednesday, 10 June 2020

Re: Priority implementation complexity (was: Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization) Kazuho Oku
Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization Kinuko Yasuda
Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization Kinuko Yasuda
Fwd: Working Group Last Call: QUIC protocol drafts Lucas Pardue

Tuesday, 9 June 2020

Re: Priority implementation complexity (was: Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization) Roy T. Fielding
Re: Priority implementation complexity (was: Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization) Dmitri Tikhonov
Re: Priority implementation complexity (was: Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization) Lucas Pardue
Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization Lucas Pardue
Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization Patrick Meenan
Re: Priority implementation complexity (was: Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization) Patrick Meenan
Re: Priority implementation complexity (was: Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization) Dmitri Tikhonov
Priority implementation complexity (was: Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization) Lucas Pardue
Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization Bence Béky
Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization Martin Thomson
Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization Kazuho Oku
Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization Eric Kinnear

Monday, 8 June 2020

Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization Yoav Weiss
Re: Registration Request for the respond-for HTTP preference Michael Toomim

Tuesday, 28 April 2020

Registration Request for the respond-for HTTP preference irakli

Sunday, 7 June 2020

Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) Repository Activity Summary Bot
Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-19: (with COMMENT) Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker

Saturday, 6 June 2020

Re: Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) Barry Leiba

Friday, 5 June 2020

Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization Lucas Pardue
Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization Patrick Meenan
Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization Lucas Pardue
Re: Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization Yoav Weiss

Thursday, 4 June 2020

Extensible Priorities and Reprioritization Lucas Pardue
I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-19.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org

Monday, 1 June 2020

One last Structured Fields issue Mark Nottingham

Sunday, 31 May 2020

Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) Repository Activity Summary Bot

Thursday, 28 May 2020

httpbis - Not having a session at IETF 108 IETF Meeting Session Request Tool

Wednesday, 27 May 2020

Re: New I-D: Retry-Scope header field Roberto Polli
DRAFT minutes from the May 2020 Interim Mark Nottingham

Tuesday, 26 May 2020

Digest wrap up: validators, algorithm parameters and buggy compression Roberto Polli
Re: Cookie-related status updates. Daniel Veditz
Cookie-related status updates. Mike West
I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-08.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org
I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-semantics-08.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org
I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-messaging-08.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org

Sunday, 24 May 2020

Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) Repository Activity Summary Bot

Friday, 22 May 2020

Re: Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18: (with COMMENT) Julian Reschke
Re: Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18: (with COMMENT) Mark Nottingham

Thursday, 21 May 2020

Re: Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-14: (with COMMENT) Eric Rescorla
Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-14: (with COMMENT) Alissa Cooper via Datatracker
Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-14: (with COMMENT) Robert Wilton via Datatracker
Magnus Westerlund's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-14: (with COMMENT) Magnus Westerlund via Datatracker
Re: Magnus Westerlund's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) Julian Reschke
Re: Magnus Westerlund's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) Poul-Henning Kamp
Re: Magnus Westerlund's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) Magnus Westerlund
Re: Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18: (with COMMENT) Murray S. Kucherawy
Re: Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18: (with COMMENT) Mark Nottingham
Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18: (with COMMENT) Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker
Re: Magnus Westerlund's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) Mark Nottingham
Re: Magnus Westerlund's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) Mark Nottingham
Re: Roman Danyliw's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) Mark Nottingham
Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-14: (with COMMENT) Martin Duke via Datatracker
Re: Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) Mark Nottingham
Re: Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) Mark Nottingham
Re: Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18: (with COMMENT) Mark Nottingham
Re: Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18: (with COMMENT) Mark Nottingham

Wednesday, 20 May 2020

Re: Roman Danyliw's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) Matthew Kerwin
Re: Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18: (with COMMENT) David Schinazi
Roman Danyliw's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) Roman Danyliw via Datatracker
Re: Client-Cert Header draft Brian Campbell
Re: I-D for a YANG data model to configure HTTP clients and servers Kent Watsen
Re: Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) Benjamin Kaduk
Magnus Westerlund's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) Magnus Westerlund via Datatracker
Re: Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) Benjamin Kaduk
Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18: (with COMMENT) Martin Duke via Datatracker
Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18: (with COMMENT) Robert Wilton via Datatracker
Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18: (with COMMENT) Éric Vyncke via Datatracker
Re: Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) Mark Nottingham
Re: I-D for a YANG data model to configure HTTP clients and servers Ben Schwartz

Tuesday, 19 May 2020

Erik Kline's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-14: (with COMMENT) Erik Kline via Datatracker
Re: I-D for a YANG data model to configure HTTP clients and servers Kent Watsen
Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-14: (with COMMENT) Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker
Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-14: (with COMMENT) Roman Danyliw via Datatracker
Re: Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) Benjamin Kaduk
Re: Client-Cert Header draft Kazuho Oku
Re: empty lists, was: Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) Julian Reschke
Re: empty lists, was: Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) Mark Nottingham
Re: Boolean param notation, Re: Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) Poul-Henning Kamp
empty lists, was: Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) Julian Reschke
Boolean param notation, Re: Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) Julian Reschke
Re: Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18: (with COMMENT) Mark Nottingham
Re: Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) Mark Nottingham
Re: empty lists?, was: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18.txt> (Structured Field Values for HTTP) to Proposed Standard Benjamin Kaduk
Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker
Re: empty lists?, was: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18.txt> (Structured Field Values for HTTP) to Proposed Standard Julian Reschke
Reminder: 1st Virtual Interim session in ~11 hours Mark Nottingham

Monday, 18 May 2020

Re: empty lists?, was: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18.txt> (Structured Field Values for HTTP) to Proposed Standard Benjamin Kaduk
Re: empty lists?, was: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18.txt> (Structured Field Values for HTTP) to Proposed Standard Mark Nottingham
Re: empty lists?, was: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18.txt> (Structured Field Values for HTTP) to Proposed Standard Benjamin Kaduk
Re: empty lists?, was: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18.txt> (Structured Field Values for HTTP) to Proposed Standard Julian Reschke
Re: empty lists?, was: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18.txt> (Structured Field Values for HTTP) to Proposed Standard Benjamin Kaduk
Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18: (with COMMENT) Alissa Cooper via Datatracker
empty lists?, was: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18.txt> (Structured Field Values for HTTP) to Proposed Standard Julian Reschke
I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-14.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org
Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18.txt> (Structured Field Values for HTTP) to Proposed Standard Mark Nottingham
Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18.txt> (Structured Field Values for HTTP) to Proposed Standard Julian Reschke
Re: Erik Kline's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18: (with COMMENT) Mark Nottingham
Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18.txt> (Structured Field Values for HTTP) to Proposed Standard Mark Nottingham
Re: Erik Kline's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18: (with COMMENT) Mark Nottingham
Re: Martin Duke's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) Mark Nottingham
Erik Kline's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18: (with COMMENT) Erik Kline via Datatracker

Sunday, 17 May 2020

Martin Duke's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) Martin Duke via Datatracker
Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) Repository Activity Summary Bot

Saturday, 16 May 2020

Friday, 15 May 2020

Thursday, 14 May 2020

I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-secondary-certs-06.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org
Re: Requesting reviews of draft-vanrein-httpauth-sasl Eric J Bowman
Re: Requesting reviews of draft-vanrein-httpauth-sasl Paul Vixie
Re: Requesting reviews of draft-vanrein-httpauth-sasl Eric Rescorla
Re: Requesting reviews of draft-vanrein-httpauth-sasl Michiel Leenaars
Re: Requesting reviews of draft-vanrein-httpauth-sasl Eric Rescorla
Re: Requesting reviews of draft-vanrein-httpauth-sasl Michiel Leenaars
Re: Requesting reviews of draft-vanrein-httpauth-sasl James

Wednesday, 13 May 2020

Re: Adoption of Prefer-Push as an experimental submission Robin MARX
Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18.txt> (Structured Field Values for HTTP) to Proposed Standard Julian Reschke
Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure: handling multiple field values Willy Tarreau
Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure: handling multiple field values Julian Reschke

Tuesday, 12 May 2020

Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure: handling multiple field values Willy Tarreau
Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure: handling multiple field values Poul-Henning Kamp
Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure: handling multiple field values Julian Reschke
Re: I-D for a YANG data model to configure HTTP clients and servers Kent Watsen
Re: Adoption of Prefer-Push as an experimental submission Evert Pot
Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure: handling multiple field values Poul-Henning Kamp
Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure: handling multiple field values Julian Reschke
Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure: handling multiple field values Ian Clelland
Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure: handling multiple field values Julian Reschke
Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure: handling multiple field values Willy Tarreau
Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure: handling multiple field values Ian Clelland
Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure: handling multiple field values Julian Reschke
Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure: handling multiple field values Willy Tarreau
draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure: handling multiple field values Julian Reschke
Re: Murray Kucherawy's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-13: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) Yoav Weiss
Re: I-D for a YANG data model to configure HTTP clients and servers Willy Tarreau
Re: I-D for a YANG data model to configure HTTP clients and servers Mark Nottingham

Monday, 11 May 2020

Re: I-D for a YANG data model to configure HTTP clients and servers Kent Watsen
Re: Murray Kucherawy's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-13: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) Murray S. Kucherawy
Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18 Ian Clelland
Re: Murray Kucherawy's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-13: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) Yoav Weiss

Sunday, 10 May 2020

Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) Repository Activity Summary Bot
Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18 Mark Nottingham
Re: I-D for a YANG data model to configure HTTP clients and servers Mark Nottingham

Friday, 8 May 2020

Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-13 Yoav Weiss

Thursday, 7 May 2020

Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-13 Christer Holmberg
Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-13 Barry Leiba
Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-13 Yoav Weiss
Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18 Willy Tarreau
Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18 Poul-Henning Kamp
Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18 Mark Nottingham

Wednesday, 6 May 2020

Re: I-D for a YANG data model to configure HTTP clients and servers Kent Watsen
Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-13 Yoav Weiss
Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-13 Christer Holmberg
Re: Requesting reviews of draft-vanrein-httpauth-sasl Rick van Rein
Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-13 Yoav Weiss
Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18 Poul-Henning Kamp
Re: I-D for a YANG data model to configure HTTP clients and servers Mark Nottingham
Re: Adoption of Prefer-Push as an experimental submission Lucas Pardue
Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18 Mark Nottingham
Adoption of Prefer-Push as an experimental submission Evert Pot

Tuesday, 5 May 2020

Requesting reviews of draft-vanrein-httpauth-sasl Tommy Pauly
Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18 David Schinazi
Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18 Poul-Henning Kamp
Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18 David Schinazi
Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-13 Christer Holmberg
Re: HTTP Priority - proposal to support headers and frames Ian Swett
I-D for a YANG data model to configure HTTP clients and servers Kent Watsen
Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-13 Yoav Weiss
Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18 Mark Nottingham

Monday, 4 May 2020

HTTP Priority - proposal to support headers and frames Lucas Pardue

Sunday, 3 May 2020

Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) Repository Activity Summary Bot

Friday, 1 May 2020

Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-13 Christer Holmberg

Thursday, 30 April 2020

WG Virtual Meeting announcement: 2020-05-[19,26] Mark Nottingham

Wednesday, 29 April 2020

Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7231 (6149) Roy T. Fielding
[Technical Errata Reported] RFC7231 (6149) RFC Errata System

Tuesday, 28 April 2020

Re: Generating a 421 status from a proxy Mark Nottingham
Re: Generating a 421 status from a proxy James Peach
Generating a 421 status from a proxy James Peach

Sunday, 26 April 2020

Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) Repository Activity Summary Bot

Friday, 24 April 2020

Re: Client-Cert Header draft Graham Leggett
Re: Client-Cert Header draft Brian Campbell
Re: Client-Cert Header draft Brian Campbell
Re: Client-Cert Header draft Brian Campbell
Re: Client-Cert Header draft Brian Campbell
I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-13.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org
Re: zstd PMCE for WebSocket Mark Nottingham

Thursday, 23 April 2020

Re: zstd PMCE for WebSocket W. Felix Handte
Re: zstd PMCE for WebSocket Felipe Gasper
Re: zstd PMCE for WebSocket W. Felix Handte

Wednesday, 22 April 2020

zstd PMCE for WebSocket Felipe Gasper
Re: Should the HTTP Method change when following a 303 redirect ? Pof Magicfingers (Giovanni Olivera)
Re: Client-Cert Header draft James
Re: New I-D: The Transport-Info HTTP Header-01 Piers O'Hanlon
Re: Should the HTTP Method change when following a 303 redirect ? Amos Jeffries
draft-btw-add-rfc8484-clarification: Review Request mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
Should the HTTP Method change when following a 303 redirect ? Pof Magicfingers (Giovanni Olivera)

Tuesday, 21 April 2020

Re: Client-Cert Header draft Graham Leggett
Re: Client-Cert Header draft David Benjamin
Re: Client-Cert Header draft Roberto Polli
Re: New I-D: Retry-Scope header field Mark Nottingham
Re: Client-Cert Header draft Soni L.

Monday, 20 April 2020

Re: Client-Cert Header draft Lucas Pardue
Re: Client-Cert Header draft Soni L.
Re: Client-Cert Header draft Lucas Pardue
Re: Client-Cert Header draft Soni L.
Re: Client-Cert Header draft Brian Campbell
Re: Client-Cert Header draft Brian Campbell
Re: Client-Cert Header draft Brian Campbell
Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-06.txt Loïc Hoguin
Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-06.txt Mike West
I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-06.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org
I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-18.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org

Sunday, 19 April 2020

Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) Repository Activity Summary Bot

Friday, 17 April 2020

Re: Client-Cert Header draft Eric Rescorla
Re: Client-Cert Header draft Soni L.
Re: Client-Cert Header draft David Benjamin
Re: Client-Cert Header draft Justin Richer
Re: Client-Cert Header draft Lucas Pardue
RE: Client-Cert Header draft Mike Bishop

Wednesday, 15 April 2020

Client-Cert Header draft Brian Campbell
Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-00.txt Justin Richer
Potential Virtual Interim in May: action required Mark Nottingham
Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-00.txt Mark Nottingham

Tuesday, 14 April 2020

Re: HTTP/2 and non-authoritative pushes Tom Bergan
Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-00.txt Richard Backman, Annabelle
Re: HTTP/2 and non-authoritative pushes Ted Hardie
HTTP/2 and non-authoritative pushes Mike Bishop
Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-00.txt Roberto Polli
Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-00.txt Julian Reschke
Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-00.txt Justin Richer
Re: Adoption of draft-richanna-http-message-signatures Roberto Polli

Sunday, 12 April 2020

Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) Repository Activity Summary Bot

Friday, 10 April 2020

I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-00.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org
Re: 100 Continue clarification Willy Tarreau

Thursday, 9 April 2020

100 Continue clarification Olivier Boel EXT

Wednesday, 8 April 2020

Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7232 (6080) Julian Reschke
[Technical Errata Reported] RFC7232 (6080) RFC Errata System

Sunday, 5 April 2020

Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) Repository Activity Summary Bot

Wednesday, 1 April 2020

[Errata Held for Document Update] RFC8441 (5500) RFC Errata System
Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8441 (5500) Julian Reschke

Last message date: Tuesday, 30 June 2020 16:31:52 UTC