W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2019

Re: New I-D: HTTP Message Signatures

From: Thomas Peterson <nosretep.samoht@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2019 15:21:46 +0000
To: "Richard Backman, Annabelle" <richanna@amazon.com>
Cc: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <5bb7abaf-7aa2-f1d2-4f33-a0b8abcae6ab@gmail.com>
Thank you for updating the repository.

You're correct - working group documents have their own repository[0] 
and if the WG adopts your document, it too will move there. Those 
documents primarily use kramdown (in addition to Martin Thomson's 
toolchain[1] which I warmly recommend) so to ease future effort you may 
want to consider converting your document. Which particular features 
does kramdown not support that you need?

Regards

0: https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions
1: https://github.com/martinthomson/i-d-template

On 13/12/2019 15:01, Richard Backman, Annabelle wrote:
> The latest changes are now available in the master branch, also under the tag draft-richanna-http-message-signatures-00. XML, TXT, and HTML versions of the draft are committed. My usual preference is to discuss things on list, but feel free to open issues or PRs if that's easier. I'm assuming that if adopted this document would move to one of the working group's repos though, so I don't think we should invest too much effort in its current home (hence why the topics for discussion are in the doc, not in issues themselves). Feel free to correct me if my understanding of HTTP WG process is incorrect.
> 
> Regarding a markdown version, my experience with kramdown-rfc2629 is that it does not support all the features I've needed when writing RFCs. Is this what the HTTP WG has been using , or is there a different toolchain I should look at? I'd prefer to work directly with xml2rfc v3, but I can do the conversion if that's how the working group operates.
> 
> –
> Annabelle Richard Backman
> AWS Identity
>   
> 
> On 12/13/19, 5:55 AM, "Thomas Peterson" <nosretep.samoht@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>      Thank you for submitting this draft Annabelle.
>      
>      Would it be possible to use your Github repository[0] for submitting
>      issues or pull requests? If so, could you update the repository as it
>      appears it differs from your submission.
>      
>      Regards
>      
>      0: https://github.com/richanna/request-signing
>      
>      On 13/12/2019 19:15, Roberto Polli wrote:
>      > Hi Annabelle,
>      >
>      >
>      > Il giorno ven 13 dic 2019 alle ore 01:21 Richard Backman, Annabelle
>      > <richanna@amazon.com> ha scritto:
>      >> I have just published a new I-D on an old topic, HTTP Message Signatures: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-richanna-http-message-signatures/
>      > Is there a markdown version? If not I can create one.
>      >
>      > To ease comments, here you can find an openly commentable google doc:
>      >
>      > -  https://docs.google.com/document/d/1QgSDeWgU-cdFpKI6FiPvGhq6zgdhVE1ZVRcAQZ6AzPE/edit
>      >
>      > I'm just starting now to add comments.
>      >
>      > Thanks and regards,
>      > R.
>      >
>      
> 
Received on Friday, 13 December 2019 15:22:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:15:43 UTC