Hi @all, for those interested in the ratelimit headers standardization proposal [1]: - The Dutch government API strategy supports it; - Kong API gateway is working to implement it https://github.com/Kong/kong/pull/5335. As a reminder, at IETF106 we discussed on: - support for structured headers (help wanted) [2] - relationship with proxies and security considerations - improve FAQ (eg. why github ratelimit model is not enough and contributes to header proliferation) [3] - support scope [4] Have a nice day, R. --- [1]: https://github.com/ioggstream/draft-polli-ratelimit-headers [2]: https://github.com/ioggstream/draft-polli-ratelimit-headers/issues/35 [3]: https://github.com/ioggstream/draft-polli-ratelimit-headers/blame/master/draft-polli-ratelimit-headers.md#L1011 [4]: https://github.com/ioggstream/draft-polli-ratelimit-headers/issues/70Received on Friday, 13 December 2019 11:10:40 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:15:43 UTC