- From: Stefan Eissing <stefan.eissing@greenbytes.de>
- Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2019 09:56:13 +0100
- To: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
- Cc: Bence Béky <bnc@chromium.org>, Mike Bishop <mbishop@evequefou.be>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Thanks for mitigating this. > Am 01.11.2019 um 14:19 schrieb Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>: > > On Fri, Nov 01, 2019 at 07:43:51AM -0400, Bence Béky wrote: >> Hi Willy, >> >> Yes, I agree with you. My current plan is to make Chrome send a frame of >> reserved type >> * on stream 0, after the SETTINGS frame; >> * on non-zero streams, after each HEADERS and DATA frame that does not have >> the END_STREAM flag set; >> * or alternatively, after each HEADERS and DATA frame, and if the stream >> should be closed, then send an empty DATA frame with END_STREAM after the >> reserved frame. >> >> I think this conforms to the state transition requirements you summarized. > > Yes that sounds good. > >> Thank you for the guidance. I'll keep the list posted. > > Thanks! > Willy >
Received on Monday, 4 November 2019 08:56:19 UTC