- From: Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>
- Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2019 13:15:34 +1100
- To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
This isn't consensus, but I agree with draft-roach-bis-documents on this subject. A wholesale replacement can just fix the bits that need fixing. We do our readership a disservice every time we ship a monkey-patch specification. On Tue, Oct 8, 2019, at 10:46, Jeff Hodges wrote: > [ just us ] > > ah, ok, something to chat about on Wed -- ie, are you thinking a > monkey-patch of rfc6797 or an entire updated spec, or ...? > > > > On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 4:48 AM Mike West <mkwst@google.com> wrote: > > Ok, thanks Mark. I'll aim to have an ID up by whenever the Singapore cutoff turns out to be. > > > > -mike > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 7:59 AM Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote: > >> Hey Mike, > >> > >> I wouldn't treat the silence as indicative of disinterest. > >> > >> Would you be willing to write up a short draft explaining your proposal and submit it for discussion in Singapore (presenting remotely if necessary)? Even if you decide not to do it here, I suspect you'll be able to reuse the markdown... > >> > >> Cheers, > >> > >> > >> > On 1 Oct 2019, at 11:47 pm, Mike West <mkwst@google.com> wrote: > >> > > >> > Ping! > >> > > >> > If this group doesn't feel any particular ownership, I'm happy to try to define some web browsery behavior in W3C/WHATWG. If y'all would prefer an RFC6797bis, great! > >> > > >> > -mike > >> > > >> > > >> > On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 3:10 AM Mike West <mkwst@google.com> wrote: > >> > A year or two ago, +John Wilander and others at Apple proposed some changes to HSTS in https://webkit.org/blog/8146/protecting-against-hsts-abuse/ that went some way towards mitigating the abuses documented in Section 14.9 of RFC6797. Given some shifts in the way we're thinking about some other concepts, I've written up a short proposal at https://github.com/mikewest/strict-navigation-security that builds upon and simplifies Apple's proposal. We discussed it briefly at yesterday's webappsec meeting, and there seems to be interest in doing something in this space. > >> > > >> > +Mark Nottingham and +Jeff Hodges suggested that I loop this group into that conversation, as the original websec group has disbanded. Is it a topic this group would like to pick up? If not, would y'all be comfortable with us defining some web browser behavior/Fetch integration in webappsec that constrains the existing RFC? > >> > > >> > Thanks! > >> > > >> > -mike > >> > >> -- > >> Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/ > >> > > > -- > Thanks, HTH, > > =JeffH
Received on Thursday, 10 October 2019 02:15:58 UTC