- From: Michael Sweet <msweet@apple.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2019 12:59:06 -0500
- To: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
- Cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 13 February 2019 18:00:01 UTC
Willy, RFC 2616 also defined the Upgrade header and 101 status code, but it doesn't cover the specific TLS upgrade case (which is why RFC 2817 exists). > On Feb 13, 2019, at 11:33 AM, Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> wrote: > > Hi Mike, > > On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 10:05:03AM -0500, Michael Sweet wrote: >> Mark, >> >> HTTP Upgrade is used by IPP/1.1 [STD92] and IPP/2.0 [PWG Standard 5100.12] >> for opportunistic TLS and has been supported and used by CUPS for about 20 >> years. I would NOT be in favor of marking it historic. > > It's also used by Websocket and even h1->h2 upgrade as well. > However I think it is completely covered by RFC7230 #6.7 : > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7230#section-6.7 > > Regards, > Willy > _________________________________________________________ Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer
Received on Wednesday, 13 February 2019 18:00:01 UTC