Re: HTTP/3 Prioritization Proposal

It's not technically necessary but it does eliminate the need to
synchronize trees for attaching to other streams. It's more of a clean-up
where we'd explicitly use placeholders for defining structure.

On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 11:54 AM Dmitri Tikhonov <> wrote:

> On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 09:20:37AM -0500, Patrick Meenan wrote:
> > Primarily for H3. Essentially to remove the ability for streams to be
> > dependent on other streams and require any logical grouping be explicit.
> >
> > It's kind of a merging of the existing spec and the proposal to have the
> > individual streams still used the proposed prioritization but to keep the
> > grouping offered by placeholders (and to remove the ability to do
> > dependencies with streams themselves).
> Do you want to remove the ability for streams to depend on each
> other directly because of personal preference or is this technically
> necessary?
>   - Dmitri.

Received on Wednesday, 30 January 2019 18:23:18 UTC