W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2019

Re: HTTP/3 Prioritization Proposal

From: Patrick Meenan <patmeenan@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2019 13:22:46 -0500
Message-ID: <CAJV+MGzxOanjSFZ4VBCAKFm=x=iGjJd593sR2zropSo72_b37A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Patrick Meenan <patmeenan@gmail.com>, Lucas Pardue <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
It's not technically necessary but it does eliminate the need to
synchronize trees for attaching to other streams. It's more of a clean-up
where we'd explicitly use placeholders for defining structure.

On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 11:54 AM Dmitri Tikhonov <
dtikhonov@litespeedtech.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 09:20:37AM -0500, Patrick Meenan wrote:
> > Primarily for H3. Essentially to remove the ability for streams to be
> > dependent on other streams and require any logical grouping be explicit.
> >
> > It's kind of a merging of the existing spec and the proposal to have the
> > individual streams still used the proposed prioritization but to keep the
> > grouping offered by placeholders (and to remove the ability to do
> > dependencies with streams themselves).
>
> Do you want to remove the ability for streams to depend on each
> other directly because of personal preference or is this technically
> necessary?
>
>   - Dmitri.
>
Received on Wednesday, 30 January 2019 18:23:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 30 January 2019 18:23:20 UTC