- From: Dmitri Tikhonov <dtikhonov@litespeedtech.com>
- Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2019 13:58:32 -0500
- To: Ian Swett <ianswett@google.com>
- Cc: Subodh Iyengar <subodh@fb.com>, Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 07:10:55AM -0500, Ian Swett wrote: > I'm not sure this is exactly what I'd specify, but I prefer this over the > existing priority scheme and I believe it's simple enough most clients > would actually implement it. Which existing scheme do you mean: HTTP/2 or HTTP/3 [1]? If the latter, why do you prefer the new proposal? - Dmitri. 1. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-quic-http-18
Received on Tuesday, 29 January 2019 18:58:56 UTC