Re: Shouldn't we add a new CLOSING state in H2 ?

On Sun, Jan 27, 2019, at 09:29, Patrick McManus wrote:
> Perhaps you are looking at a broader issue than I am (and thought was what
> wily was describing).. I was specifically referring to the pattern that
> forces the RST when tcp data hits the closed connection which in return
> forces the truncation and dropping of buffered valid recvd (even ack'd)
> data on the client.. That should go away (ha) in h3, no?

So if the server closes the connection, it will re-send the packet containing the CONNECTION_CLOSE, but that's all.  Whatever data the client might have received should still be available.

Received on Saturday, 26 January 2019 22:32:00 UTC