- From: Daniel Veditz <dveditz@mozilla.com>
- Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2019 16:41:33 -0700
- To: Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>
- Cc: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 6 June 2019 23:42:09 UTC
Hi Rob, A lot of sites have been coded with the assumption that the fragment is a safe place to stuff data that explicitly won't be sent to the server (in fact that's why AJAX sites started using #! -- seems odd that now you want to send it). Before postMessage() it was even used as a message-passing mechanism. Changing this is not backwards compatible in the big picture. Maybe as an opt-in, but if a site wanted to opt-in why wouldn't they just change their URLs to put the bit they want to share in front of the # instead of after? When do you propose the fragment be sent? Would it start triggering loads on each transition in an site that uses "#!" ? Or are you proposing to only send it when current algorithms would trigger a load? -Dan Veditz
Received on Thursday, 6 June 2019 23:42:09 UTC