Re: Status code 422 in http-core uses the term `entity`. Should we use `representation` ? from Roberto Polli on 2019-05-15 (ietf-http-wg@w3.org from April to June 2019)

From: Roberto Polli <roberto@teamdigitale.governo.it>
Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 10:33:07 +0200
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CAMRHeuxd+=UBG-jA9xMqCGSSi+3uPsQj7T2+bUupqHutUQsnMw@mail.gmail.com>

Hi J,


Il giorno mer 15 mag 2019 alle ore 08:41 Julian Reschke
<julian.reschke@gmx.de> ha scritto:
> > - https://github.com/httpwg/http-core/issues/224
> > - it should use the term `representation`
> "enclosed representation"
Ok, I'm following the thread on gh.

> > - the definition should expand the original statements which are tied to webdav
> >    so that it could be more generic
> Please be more specific.

Your PR https://github.com/httpwg/http-core/pull/226
clarifies, so it's ok

> > - we could add one or two examples with the correct 422 usage
> I'm not against examples, but we currently have none in this section.
> Adding just a few for 422 would be weird.
Ok!

Thanks++,
R.

Received on Wednesday, 15 May 2019 08:33:48 UTC