> On 2 May 2019, at 5:55 pm, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: > >> >> However, I think Link is a bad example to build off because it is a >> "parameterised" thingy, but we've already restricted the set of >> parameterisable thingies in SH to just sh-tokens. So we couldn't >> recreate Link in SH even if we wanted to, without even more work. So >> why bother adding a new type for it? And we don't need a structured >> type for Location, because that's not structured per se. >> >> So I'm for closing with no action. >> ... > > That's actually a good point, but then there's the recent > <https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/797>: > >> in Signed Exchanges, @jyasskin asks about having Parameterised Lists whose parameterised identifiers are things other than Tokens. I don't see the connection. -- Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/Received on Friday, 3 May 2019 07:15:51 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:44:01 UTC