- From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Date: Thu, 02 May 2019 17:59:40 +0000
- To: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
- cc: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>, Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
-------- In message <20190502174129.GF32325@1wt.eu>, Willy Tarreau writes: >I think that the opposition against support of empty values only came >from an almost inexistent need at a moment [...] As far as I could tell, that was a completely nonexistent need, but to me it matters little if we are trying to generalize from only one example or from no example at all. And please remember that SH is a meta-specification, a specification to write other specifications with. If a documented use case appears and a concensus for how to meet its needs can be found, publishing a SHbis will not hurt anybody, or create any compatibility issues since the specs that references SHorig are not changed by SHbiss mere existence. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Thursday, 2 May 2019 18:00:07 UTC