Re: Empty lists in Structured Headers (#781)

On 02.05.2019 18:56, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> --------
> In message <627257EE-FE78-40A6-AA91-9E488C53A8FC@gbiv.com>, "Roy T. Fielding" w
> rites:
>
>> This is not how the IETF is supposed to work on standards track proposals.
>
> I think that era died with Jon Postel and the rubberstamping of H2 ?
>
> I will 100% agree with you that the SH draft is a lot less ambitious
> than pretty much anything which have been discussed along the way.
>
> JSON died on the the general distaste for UniCode in HTTP headers,
> and the fact that once it had been shoe-horned into HTTP/1 headers
> it would no longer be JSON anyway.

You keep saying it, but it continues to be incorrect.

I'm in favor of SH in general, but please stick to the facts instead of
making up reasons for how we got here.

> ...

Best regards, Julian

Received on Thursday, 2 May 2019 17:09:41 UTC