I am in support of adopting this. This looks useful to know what was
happened in (reverse) proxy.
- Masaori
On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 8:15 PM Cory Benfield <cory@lukasa.co.uk> wrote:
> I'm in favour of adoption of this document: I think this kind of
> metadata would be very useful in many organisations.
>
> Cory
>
> On Thu, 11 Apr 2019 at 01:27, Tommy Pauly <tpauly@apple.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hello HTTPBis,
> >
> > In our meeting in Prague, we had a presentation of a new document, "The
> Proxy-Status HTTP Header Field”. There was positive response in the room
> about adopting this in the working group.
> >
> > The document can be found here:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nottingham-proxy-status-00
> >
> > This email starts a call for adoption. Please reply to this email with
> your thoughts, and state whether or not you believe the group should adopt
> this document. Feedback is requested by Wednesday, April 24.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Tommy
>
>