Re: Final DATA frames

On Sat, Dec 08, 2018 at 10:18:04AM +0900, Kazuho Oku wrote:
> Admittedly, the alternatives have less chance in making it to v1. But
> the question is, is always using length field so bad that we cannot
> wait for a more ideal fix?

I don't think it's so bad.  The overhead incurred by the DATA frames
is small: 0.2% to 0.02% [1].  I think we can live with it for v1.

  - Dmitri.


Received on Sunday, 9 December 2018 21:27:03 UTC