- From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
- Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2018 03:37:43 -0800 (PST)
- To: fielding@gbiv.com, mnot@mnot.net, julian.reschke@greenbytes.de, ben@nostrum.com, aamelnikov@fastmail.fm, adam@nostrum.com, mnot@mnot.net, patrick.ducksong@gmail.com, tpauly@apple.com
- Cc: tortoise_74@yahoo.co.uk, ietf-http-wg@w3.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7234, "Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Caching". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5564 -------------------------------------- Type: Technical Reported by: Bruce Adams <tortoise_74@yahoo.co.uk> Section: 4.2.4 Original Text ------------- A cache MUST NOT send stale responses unless it is disconnected (i.e., it cannot contact the origin server or otherwise find a forward path) or doing so is explicitly allowed (e.g., by the max-stale request directive; see Section 5.2.1). Corrected Text -------------- A cache SHOULD NOT send stale responses unless it is disconnected (i.e., it cannot contact the origin server or otherwise find a forward path) or doing so is explicitly allowed (e.g., by the max-stale request directive; see Section 5.2.1). A cache MAY send stale responses if a cache-control extension for stale content such as "stale-while-revalidate" is used (see RFC5861). Notes ----- The original text seems to conflict with https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5861#section-3 3. The stale-while-revalidate Cache-Control Extension When present in an HTTP response, the stale-while-revalidate Cache- Control extension indicates that caches MAY serve the response in which it appears after it becomes stale, up to the indicated number of seconds. stale-while-revalidate = "stale-while-revalidate" "=" delta-seconds If a cached response is served stale due to the presence of this extension, the cache SHOULD attempt to revalidate it while still serving stale responses (i.e., without blocking). See also https://stackoverflow.com/questions/53324538/rest-low-latency-how-should-i-reply-to-a-get-while-an-upload-is-pending Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC7234 (draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-26) -------------------------------------- Title : Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Caching Publication Date : June 2014 Author(s) : R. Fielding, Ed., M. Nottingham, Ed., J. Reschke, Ed. Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis APP Area : Applications Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
Received on Tuesday, 27 November 2018 11:38:08 UTC