Re: No validator in 200 response for conditional update

On 2018-10-27 08:04, Yishuai Li wrote:
> I am also confused by this clause. Consider the following scenario (for 
> simplicity, the entity-tag is identical to entity, and the all requests 
> have the same target):
> 
> (1) A --> S : PUT "a" (unconditional)
> (2) S --> A : 204 No Content, ETag: "a"
> (3) A --> S : PUT "a", If-Match: "b" (not satisfied)
> (4) S --> A : 204 No Content
 > ...

Why would step (4) result in a 204? Should be Precondition Failed, no?

Best regards, Julian

Received on Monday, 29 October 2018 13:05:54 UTC