Re: Privacy properties of a cookie replacement (was "Re: Some half-baked thoughts about cookies.")

--------
In message <2594476.hbmTAoiaoX@hegel>, Rigo Wenning writes:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA256
>
>On Monday, August 27, 2018 11:01:45 AM CEST Mike West wrote:
>> > - stateless operation to become a more normal thing, e.g. I'd
>> > like stateless operation to work more often/better when
>> > browsing sites with which I don't have a relationship
>> 
>> These two seem to be inextricably bound together, as it seems
>> likely to me that intentionally stateless operations on the web
>> today are few and far between. Basically everything interesting
>> we do on the web today requires state of some kind to bind HTTP
>> requests together, even when that state isn't explicitly
>> user-focused (see the discussion of routing metadata Willy raised
>> earlier in
>> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/2018JulSep/0203.
>> html).
>
>Just a small remark: Most of the stateful interaction in plain 
>content browsing (HTML4.01) is required to measure outreach to 
>justify cost of advertisement or to make statistics.

This is where it is important to remember that they are called
"Human Rights" and not "Business Rights" :-)

Privacy is much more important than being able to optimize profit.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.

Received on Monday, 27 August 2018 10:10:16 UTC