- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2018 07:40:45 +0200
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>, Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com>
On 2018-08-15 07:50, Mark Nottingham wrote: > As I understand it, implementations are already using this value, so changing the token specified might cause further interoperability issues. > > As such, the pragmatic thing to do seems to be #2 below -- registering "websocket" as an alias (probably with a note explaining why). > > Since the registry is FCFS, I don't think we need to get the registration request into *this* document -- but if anyone disagrees, please say so ASAP, as it's in AUTH48. > > Cheers, > ... I think it would be good to fix the IANA registry before publishing this document. Best regards, Julian
Received on Monday, 27 August 2018 05:41:12 UTC