- From: Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>
- Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2018 13:15:05 -0400
- To: Nick Sullivan <nick@cloudflare.com>, mnot <mnot@mnot.net>, "Ludin, Stephen" <sludin@akamai.com>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAOdDvNrNCUQF39vzGbqU1Q0bNgQeK9WEUNmN0oDX0EcAESqFVw@mail.gmail.com>
Stephen, Mark, Nick, Based on feedback HTTPbis will be adopting this document set. Please submit the -00's to the data tracker as draft-ietf-httpbis-* and upload to the github http-extensions repo. Thanks! On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 12:27 AM, Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz> wrote: > On 27/07/18 09:11, Patrick McManus wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > When we met in Montreal there was strong interest in the room in > > adopting the presented cdn-loop-prevention draft, with no dissenting hum > > on the topic. This message opens that call for adoption discussion on > > the list. > > > > Specifically, if you didn't have a chance to participate in that > > discussion please reply to this email with your opinion and reasons for > > or against adoption of the loop prevention draft > > (https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-cdn-loop-prevention-00) as a proposed > > standards track document. Discussion on any points raised relevant to > > the draft is also welcome here. > > > > As discussed, the document deals specifically with loop prevention at > > the scope of a CDN and we're accepting that its an intrinsic part of the > > document if we take it on (of course adopting it does not obligate the > > group to eventually publish it, but changing the scope of the loop > > detection would be out of scope for changes to it.) > > > > I'll hold the CFA open until August 9th. > > > > Thanks > > -Patrick > > > > I still don't see the utility of adding yet another mechanism here - it > just looks like more complexity for those of us implementing them. Which > the implementations attempting to be worked around will block/break the > same way they break the existing mechanisms. > > That said, I'm not going to vote against adoption if thats what the rest > of the WG want. > > Amos > >
Received on Monday, 13 August 2018 17:15:35 UTC