Re: Issue with draft-ietf-httpbis-h2-websockets-07 (in RFC Editor queue)

Just to point out: the registry uses the singular, “WebSocket”. I don’t think any major implementations send the plural (regardless of case).

-FG

> On Aug 10, 2018, at 7:12 AM, Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com> wrote:
> 
> both specs say to send "websocket" from the registry. We should make the registry reflect the world rather than trying to do it the other way around. Its just a registry.
> 
> 
> 
>> On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 2:14 AM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
>>> On 2018-08-10 07:55, Andy Green wrote:
>>> ...
>>>>> When you say, "fix the protocol (ws over h2)" what do you envisage getting "fixed" in that?
>>>> 
>>>> That would mean changing "websockets" to "WebSockets".
>>> 
>>> Or just register "websockets" in the "HTTP Upgrade token registry" and job done without changing anything else?
>>> ...
>> 
>> In that case we'd have two tokens in the registry for web sockets, but only the lowercased variant would work for ws-over-h2.
>> 
>> Best regards, Julian
>> 
> 

Received on Friday, 10 August 2018 12:45:21 UTC