- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2018 09:46:49 +0200
- To: Ilya Grigorik <ilya@igvita.com>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
- Cc: hurtta-ietf@elmme-mailer.org, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
On 2018-08-04 23:15, Ilya Grigorik wrote: > Hi Kari. Thanks for the feedback. > > On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 9:14 AM HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org > <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>> wrote: > > | If DPR occurs in a message more than once, the last value overrides > | all previous occurrences. > > So is that saying that if there is several DPR values on > DPR Header Field, last value is used ? > > > Yes, that's the intent. > > If that in interpreted only that if last DPR header field is used, > and header field is ignored if it does not fit > > DPR = 1*DIGIT [ "." 1*DIGIT ] > > syntax, result is different is recipient combines multiple > DPR headers. > > > The intent was to specify that last valid value (regardless if it is > within a combined or separate header) is the one that should be used by > the client. My read of the current wording is that it matches this > intent, but I'll defer to the experts here on how to best word this if > that's not the case. > > Mark, Julian: any guidance on this one? > > | If <X> occurs in a message more than once, the last value > | overrides all previous occurrences. > > So it should mention that on these header fields also last value > is used when values are ',' -separated. > > > My understanding is that this is implicit, but if that's not the case, > happy to rework the wording. > ... No, it's not implicit, so yes, a clarification would be good. FWIW, related issue in http-core: <https://github.com/httpwg/http-core/issues/111> Best regards, Julian
Received on Sunday, 5 August 2018 07:47:28 UTC