SRV and HTTP

> On 11 Jul 2018, at 3:55 am, Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca> wrote:
> 
> On Jul 10, 2018, at 18:02, Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> wrote:
> 
>> In large part because DNS provides "a richer scheme that accommodates address families and multiple addresses with priorities".
> 
> *cups hand to ear*
> 
> Was that the sound of a distant desire to specify use of SRV for HTTP?
> 

I recently did some digging on this topic, and can try to characterise what the issues / objections are.

Would people be interested in a (hopefully brief) side meeting to discuss and maybe come to a shared understanding of the problem space?

Cheers,

--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/

Received on Wednesday, 11 July 2018 01:23:24 UTC