- From: Guilherme Hermeto <gui.hermeto@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2018 10:37:29 -0700
- To: Matthew Kerwin <matthew@kerwin.net.au>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 30 March 2018 17:38:24 UTC
I would definitely like to see that, but I think we can go even further and have a FETCH method, as the one described in CoAP ( https://core-wg.github.io/etch/#intro-fetch). The CoAP FETCH method was based on the SEARCH proposal from J. Snell ( https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-snell-search-method-00), but would be broader, addressing the issue that SEARCH would be too specific. Thoughts? On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 4:03 AM, Matthew Kerwin <matthew@kerwin.net.au> wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I just noticed Mark opened [GET > w/body](https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/546), which > reminds me again of draft-snell-search-method. It came up for me back > in January, but then other things got in the way. > > Do you think there's still a strong motivation to get a > general-purpose `SEARCH` RFC published? Is it something the WG would > be interested in taking on? > > Cheers > -- > Matthew Kerwin > https://matthew.kerwin.net.au/ > >
Received on Friday, 30 March 2018 17:38:24 UTC