- From: Mike Bishop <mbishop@evequefou.be>
- Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2018 18:31:05 +0000
- To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <MWHPR08MB2432213CA1E00C15FF346F11DAC00@MWHPR08MB2432.namprd08.prod.outlook.com>
During the HTTP/QUIC header compression discussions, we've been discussing whether there's a requirement to have streaming / single-pass header compressors or if it's reasonable to assume that an encoder has access to the full header set at once. I know during the HPACK design process, streaming decoders were a priority, but I don't recall anything about streaming encoders. So I'd like to consult the HTTP community to see whether implementations have requirements around this. Because HEADERS frames are length-prefixed, you have to know the full content of the frame before you can send any of it. In HTTP/2, there is a way around this - CONTINUATION frames can be used for subsequent chunks as you generate them. However, I don't know that I've heard of anyone using CONTINUATION for this purpose. In HTTP/QUIC, we've removed CONTINUATION frames in favor of much larger frame lengths, and to general approval because CONTINUATION was a source of bugs and angst. However, that means it's no longer possible to write the beginning of the frame without having seen and processed the entire header set. Is that a change we need to revisit?
Received on Tuesday, 27 February 2018 18:31:36 UTC