Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7230 (5257)

On 2018-02-12 16:54, Richard Gibson wrote:
> LGTM, but maybe a little more clear if you swap the order of the first 
> two alternatives.
> ...

FWIW, I believe we need to actually *verify* the ABNF against known 
inputs and have test cases.

Can anybody recommend an open source parser generator that consumes IETF 
ABNF?

Best regards, Julian

Received on Monday, 12 February 2018 16:30:01 UTC