- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2018 07:44:09 +0100
- To: Matthew Kerwin <matthew@kerwin.net.au>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com>
On 2018-02-09 08:46, Matthew Kerwin wrote: > ... > Editorial: > > * No references until Section 2.1? I would have expected an earlier > pointer to RFC7233 (at the least), maybe even in the introduction. Please see the changes in <https://www.greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-httpbis-rand-access-live-latest-from-previous.diff.html>. > ... > * From Section 2.1 on there's a bunch of ABNF, but there's no > fore-warning of that anywhere in the document. Is it okay to defer > that entirely to the normative reference [RFC7233]? I stumbled across that as well. However, the ABNF is just cited from the spec, it doesn't have a normative role here. > * In 2.2: "Very Large Value", with caps, looks like it should have a > definition somewhere ;) (Also it's not consistently capitalised > throughout the document, one way or the other.) > ... Yep.
Received on Monday, 12 February 2018 06:45:59 UTC