Re: Interest in a UDP equivalent to the CONNECT method


Apologies if I missed anything out.

Based on this feedback I’m inclined to write up a more rounded technical proposal to help frame further discussion. This might separate out the WebRTC theme to disentangle the different aspects.

When writing up the proposal, I would be hoping for a clarification about what kind of proxy we’re addressing, meaning being clear on “forward” or “reverse proxy” context.

I understand that this could potentially be left out from the draft given one limits the scope of the draft, but the example you gave in previous email- the “web proxy” configured in the browser- is a forward proxy as I see it, and the reverse proxy case, where the origin redirects the client to an end point indicating use of proxy(ies) is an interesting use case also.

So what kind of proxies did you have in mind?

Regards
Lucas

Received on Tuesday, 6 February 2018 18:44:53 UTC